Corporate Water Abusers Should Not Be Trusted As Stewards of the World's Water

The unsustainable and consumptive practices of industrialization that have escalated over the last one hundred years have brought us to a crucial tipping point. We are facing a water crisis of monumental proportions, further exacerbated by pollution, climate changes and population growth. Two billion people now live in water-stressed regions and unless drastic action is taken by the year 2025, two-thirds of the world's population will experience water scarcity.

It is therefore not surprising that many major corporations that produce products through manufacturing processes that are inherently water intensive and polluting have mounted a campaign to position themselves as stewards of the world's water. The Corporate Water Footprinting Conference taking place in San Francisco, California today is an example of such hypocrisy.

Many of the companies involved in the conference are food and beverage companies, many of which use large amounts of plastic to market their food products. Each 2.2 pounds of PET plastic requires just under 78 gallons of water to produce. How will that consumption of water figure into their water footprints? Likewise, how will Con Agra, a major producer of processed food, account for the water used in producing the agricultural crops present in many of its products?

Any genuine attempt to reduce water use should begin with an assessment of the need for the products being manufactured. That means going beyond the use of water in an isolated manufacturing process and actually performing an assessment of the products being produced. It also means doing a full life cycle analysis of the water used, from the production of all components to the product's ultimate disposal.

Agriculture accounts for 70-80 percent of the nation's water use. This water is withdrawn and lost from local environments as it is guzzled up by the industrialized production of crops and livestock. Furthermore, industrialized agriculture often pollutes water supplies from run-off tainted with toxic pesticides and fertilizers.

Similarly, every year, 30 trillion gallons of water irrigate U.S. cropland. In the 18 U.S. states that are dependant on irrigation, about 70 percent of the stream and river water has been depleted. In the western and southern regions of our country, about 60 percent of irrigation water is from surface sources. The rest comes from underground water, which rain replaces at less than a 0.1 percent annual rate.

The production of corn, a hidden ingredient in much of the world's processed food thanks to the food industry's heavy reliance on corn oil and high fructose corn syrup, is a good illustration of industrial agriculture's hoggish ways with water. A major commodity crop, farmers pour about 500,000 gallons of water on each acre of corn annually. That amounts to about 75 gallons for one pound of corn -- an unsustainable level of water use.

Animals raised for meat further drain world water resources and contribute to polluted waterways. Take for example Dean Foods, one of the sponsors of the footprinting conference. The largest milk processor in the U.S., it controls nearly nearly 40 percent of the U.S. milk market, peddling its product under 50 different brand names. Given that dairy operations consume an estimated 50 to 200 gallons of water per cow per day, those processing for Dean could be using as much as 580 million gallons of water every day.

In terms of environmental stewardship, they don't fare much better. Most large dairies in the West use water to flush manure out of barns and into manure lagoons. This is an extremely wasteful method of manure management. A typical 1,000-cow dairy using a flush system generates between 50,000 and 75,000 gallons of liquid manure each day.

Dean also has a history of putting profit before water quality. In 1996, a Dean subsidiary, Dean Dairy Products, Inc., was found guilty of nearly 2,000 violations of the Clean Water Act and fined $4 million for repeatedly dumping milk solids and other pollutants into public water sources. The court found that Dean had delayed addressing its pollution for six years in order to reap higher profits.

Of course, one ultimately needs to look no further than the bottled water industry, represented at this conference by Nestle, for obvious examples of irresponsible water resource management. When Nestle removes water from areas where it mines water, it adversely affects the local ecosystems and racks up an enormous carbon footprint. As a whole, the bottled water industry used 14.1 billion gallons of water to produce the 4.7 billion gallons of water that they bottled in 2006.

The Corporate Water Footprinting conference is nothing but another public relations exercise to expand the market share and profits of the very corporations responsible for the global water crisis while they seek to falsely portray themselves as stewards of the world's water. These corporations are shrouding their abuse of water in Orwellian technical jargon like water neutrality and claims that they are lessening their water footprint in a desperate attempt to blue wash their irresponsible squandering of one our most precious resources.

We call on the upcoming Obama administration to take all the actions necessary to more strictly regulate water pollution from agriculture and industry. Likewise, we call on the United Nations and all concerned governments to come together in a global water summit to advance positive solutions towards a just and sustainable water future. The solutions to the world's water crisis should not be entrusted to the resource's greatest abusers.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.