Californians Have a Chance to Make the Lives of the Animals They Use a Little More Humane

I have spent most of this past decade watching humankind's cruelty towards other Earthlings. I'm not an investigator for PETA or the Humane Society or even the US Department of Agriculture. I'm just a documentary filmmaker.

In 1999, I took a job to create a series of PSAs about spaying and neutering pets. The footage I shot at animal shelters around Los Angeles affected me so profoundly that this project evolved into Earthlings, a feature-length documentary. Earthlings is about how dependent we human beings are on animals in five key industries, one of which is industrial farm animal production. The film would take me almost six years to complete, partly because of the difficulty in obtaining footage from this highly secretive, heavily guarded business.

On November 4, California voters will make a decision on Proposition 2, "Standards for Confining Farm Animals," which addresses the use of veal crates, gestation crates, and battery cages in factory farms. (These reforms would take effect in 2015, and do not address the treatment or slaughter of animals, only the size of the cages they live in until they are killed.) Proponents say Proposition 2 will alleviate animal suffering, increase food safety, give family farms a competitive edge against big agribusiness, and reduce pollution from factory farms. Opponents say it will be costly to businesses and consumers. Meanwhile, farm animals, lacking a PR machine of their own, have not been heard from.

In doing research for our film, I was exposed to more of the inside workings of these animal operations than I could ever forget or ignore. This is not to boast, but I've pored over hundreds of hours of footage showing that breeding, raising, and slaughtering animals for food is an ugly, violent practice. I studied thousands of pages of documentation to compile the facts, statistics and information that served as the script's central narrative thread, in order to present this sensitive issue in a way that educated viewers without alienating them.

When I was ready to release this film, distributors were adamantly opposed to it. One even told me the footage I included "should be swept under the rug." They are not alone. Even people who are conscious and compassionate by nature often prefer to ignore the barbaric reality of the use of animals for food. We don't live in a vacuum, disconnected from other Earthlings, no matter how comfortable and convenient it is to believe this. We live in a civilization, and this requires us to understand the impact of our choices on the rest of civilization.

The more destructive our choices are, the more we're compelled to examine and justify them. Most people would cringe to see the brutal treatment animals endure, particularly to the extent that I've seen, and this is a positive reaction, because it reminds us who we truly are. This response shows humanity. Of course, it's possible to ignore who we are, but in the long run that creates more discomfort and more inconvenience.

Arizona, Colorado, Florida, and Oregon have already acknowledged their humanity by passing bans on the types of crates that prevent calves and pregnant pigs from being able to sit, lie down, turn around, or stretch their bodies. California's proposition extends these same considerations to the 19 million egg-laying hens in battery cages like these in this recent undercover video from a Southern California egg operation. (Not surprisingly, the perpetrator of this atrocity is the leading contributor to the campaign against Prop 2.)

The three stages of truth are said to be ridicule, violent opposition, and acceptance. While we are nowhere near total acceptance, it's clear we have passed the stage of ridicule. Otherwise, legislation like Prop 2 would not be intellectually possible, nor would a film like ours have been as successful as it has been. When we make the connection between our actions and their impact on other Earthlings, we are able to make these kinds of changes that create a more humane, peaceful world.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.