Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?

I usually shy away from conspiracy theories.

When the Democrats and their attorneys began claiming last year that the Bush administration was using its prosecutorial might to target opposition candidates and their major financial supporters, I greeted the allegation with a skeptical eye.

I'm not so sure anymore.

This past week's developments in the four-year-old investigation into the failed Mississippi Beef Processors plant seem timed to help derail Democrat Ronnie Musgrove's bid to snatch one of the state's two U.S. Senate seats from Republican hands.

Three Georgia businessmen, one by one over the course of four days, entered guilty pleas to federal charges arising out of the Yalobusha County beef plant's quick and costly demise.

The three, all executives with The Facility Group of Smyrna, Ga., were largely left off the hook on the more serious charges that they had swindled the state out of at least $2 million and had left the plant's vendors and contractors holding the bag.

Instead, they were allowed in a plea bargain to confess to trying to buy influence with Musgrove by steering $25,000 to the then-governor's unsuccessful re-election campaign in 2003.

The orchestrated guilty pleas -- and the prosecutors' suggestion that more indictments could be forthcoming -- are a boon to the campaign of Republican Roger Wicker, who was appointed to the vacant Senate seat in December but is considered vulnerable. They leave a cloud over Musgrove in voters minds and provide more fodder for negative campaign ads from the GOP camp, even though Musgrove has not been charged with any wrongdoing and there's nothing in the court records to document he did anything illegal.

Musgrove may have put himself at risk of guilt by association by accepting campaign donations from some scoundrels. That's a fact. But whose campaign finance reports, including Wicker's or Gov. Haley Barbour's, could stand up to the close scrutiny that the federal prosecutors decided to give this one?

Some of what The Facility Group did in helping Musgrove's 2003 gubernatorial campaign is copied by businesses all the time. Corporations routinely form PACs as a way to skirt the $1,000 contribution limit on corporations, and they give money to candidates in hopes of securing access and favorable treatment. If the feds were to prosecute every political donor who had a state contract, they could fill up all of the federal courtrooms in Mississippi with defendants.

What the Facility Group did that was blatantly illegal, according to the original indictment, was how it got the company employees to pony up for Musgrove. The corporation's executives allegedly asked employees to write $1,000 personal checks to the Musgrove campaign and then reimbursed them with enough bonus in their paychecks to cover the contribution, thus concealing that the money actually came from The Facility Group.

There's no evidence, however, that Musgrove was aware of the scheme.

And as far as The Facility Group winning the $3.5 million contract in 2003 to manage the design and construction of the troubled plant, the indictment hints that Musgrove may have steered away another interested bidder, but it is thin on proof.

The Facility Group was awarded the contract by the state's Land, Water and Timber Resources Board, not by Musgrove. The governor personally didn't have a vote on that decision, although his economic development director, Bob Rohrlack, was co-chairman and did. However, also among the nine board members who voted unanimously to hire The Facility Group was the other co-chairman, Agriculture Commissioner Lester Spell. Spell, it should be remembered, avoided political demise from the beef plant debacle by conveniently converting to the Republican Party.

The point is, there are a lot of folks who share responsibility for what went wrong with Mississippi Beef Processors and the $55 million it cost taxpayers. The project was ill-conceived from the start. One crook, Richard Hall Jr., was recruited to own and run the plant. Another crook, Sean Carothers, was hired to build it. And then a team of crooks, The Facility Group , was paid to try to salvage it.

Musgrove, though, was at most a minor player in the mess.

Yet the efforts to link him publicly to the corruption scandal, using the combined power of the federal prosecutors and a Republican state auditor , have intensified since Musgrove announced his intentions to challenge Wicker for the Senate seat.

The conspiracy theorists see a pattern. They cite the unrelated bribery convictions of Democratic former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman and Mississippi trial lawyer Paul Minor, a major donor to Democratic candidates, as earlier proof that political affiliation is determining who gets investigated and prosecuted by the Justice Department. That allegation is being looked at by congressional panels even while both convictions are on appeal.

As with most conspiracy theories, events don't always fit the pattern perfectly. Richard Scruggs, Mississippi's most famous and wealthiest trial lawyer, is now in federal prison following a separate bribery probe. Scruggs may have given more money over the years to Democrats than Republicans, but the brother-in-law of Trent Lott was also well-connected in the GOP.

Still, the federal government's help in slandering Musgrove less than 90 days before the election has a suspicious feel to it.

ACLU By ACLUSponsored

Imagine you've forgotten once again the difference between a gorilla and a chimpanzee, so you do a quick Google image search of “gorilla." But instead of finding images of adorable animals, photos of a Black couple pop up.

Is this just a glitch in the algorithm? Or, is Google an ad company, not an information company, that's replicating the discrimination of the world it operates in? How can this discrimination be addressed and who is accountable for it?

“These platforms are encoded with racism," says UCLA professor and best-selling author of Algorithms of Oppression, Dr. Safiya Noble. “The logic is racist and sexist because it would allow for these kinds of false, misleading, kinds of results to come to the fore…There are unfortunately thousands of examples now of harm that comes from algorithmic discrimination."

On At Liberty this week, Dr. Noble joined us to discuss what she calls “algorithmic oppression," and what needs to be done to end this kind of bias and dismantle systemic racism in software, predictive analytics, search platforms, surveillance systems, and other technologies.

What you can do:
Take the pledge: Systemic Equality Agenda
Sign up