Is Hillary Using "Tonya Harding Tactics" to Take Down Barack?

Way back in March, Carpetbagger regular Jim Benton encouraged the Clinton campaign to “stop with the Tonya Harding tactics.” Apparently, it’s a comparison that’s catching on. Jake Tapper reports:
I just spoke with a Democratic Party official, who asked for anonymity so as to speak candidly, who said we in the media are all missing the point of this Democratic fight.
The delegate math is difficult for Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, the official said. But it’s not a question of CAN she achieve it. Of course she can, the official said.
The question is — what will Clinton have to do in order to achieve it? What will she have to do to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, in order to eke out her improbable victory?
She will have to “break his back,” the official said. She will have to destroy Obama, make Obama completely unacceptable.
“Her securing the nomination is certainly possible - but it will require exercising the ‘Tonya Harding option.’” the official said. “Is that really what we Democrats want?”

In late February and early March, when the Clinton campaign’s offensive began in earnest, staffers told reporters they were calling it the “kitchen-sink strategy.” That seemed apt, though the “Tonya Harding option” certainly has a bit more flare, doesn’t it?

As for the question from the party official, I suspect most Democrats are saying, “No, this isn’t what we want.”

I suppose there was a point, maybe eight or nine days ago, when Clinton supporters could reasonably make the argument that the Jeremiah Wright controversy was so explosive, and the media was playing edited versions of Wright’s sermons so frequently, the party should wait to see if Democrats and voters in general repelled from the Obama campaign in disgust. Maybe, they thought, this was the break they’d been waiting for.

Except that hasn’t happened. Obama has rebounded from the controversy, has retaken a slight lead in the polls, and the overall campaign dynamic is not significantly different than it was before the Wright issue landed on front pages. Worse, it’s Clinton, not Obama, who’s been stuck with an awkward controversy (the flap surrounding her false claims about her 1996 Bosnia trip) that undermines her credibility.

So, we’re left with the “Tonya Harding option.” And what does that include? Clearly, Clinton’s attack on Wright yesterday is part of it, but that’s not all.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.