Washington GOP Caucus: Why Recount the Votes?

There's a developing thread of more than curious reports on various blogs that Washington state's GOP party chairman has been less than inclined to finish counting the votes in the state's presidential caucus on Saturday.

Josh Marshall of TalkingPointsMemo notes that the man running the state's presidential caucus, Luke Esser, all-but declared John McCain as the winner with 13 percent of the vote uncounted. The hitch: Mike Huckabee was trailing McCain by a little more than 1 percentage point.

But that was this weekend. On Monday, state GOP chair Luke Esser said he was trying harder to get close to counting 100 percent of the votes, although it was an effort - despite protests from candidate Mike Huckabee who compared the episode to the old Soviet Union.

Then the story gets spicier. TPM's Paul Kiel was the lucky recipient of an e-mail that quoted Esser as a hyperventilating college student, when he encouraged outright voter suppression of less-than-human Democrats. Among the more quotable part of TPM's post was student Esser's rant on the eve of the 1986 midterm election:


"Years of interminable welfare checks and free government services have made these modern-day sloths even more lazy. They will vote on election day, if it isn't much of a bother. But even the slightest inconvenience can keep them from the polling place."
"And since, he wrote, "[m]any of the most successful anti-deadbeat voter techniques (poll taxes, sound beatings, etc.) that conservatives have used in the past have been outlawed by busybody judges," he was organizing a "Rain Dance" for conservatives that night."
A complete posting of Esser's collegiate statement was also found on horsesass.org.

While many people may find the Washington state caucus drama entertaining or eyebrow-raising or loathsome or sadly predictable, Democrats have had their own problems with running caucuses this winter.

In Nevada, Democratic state party workers were turning away low-income workers at special at-large casino caucus sites because they didn't have specific work shifts that day - disenfranchising voters while possibly helping the Clinton campaign. And Clinton volunteers were told to lock caucus doors a half-hour early, another innocent mistake no doubt.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.