Mukasey on Waterboarding: 'It Would Be Torture If It Were Done to Me'

Attorney General Michael Mukasey went before the Senate Judiciary Committee this morning -- his first appearance since his confirmation hearings last fall -- but don't feel too bad if you weren't watching C-Span. Despite deploying some pointed questions -- "Would waterboarding be torture if done to you?" (Answer: "I would feel that it was") -- the Senators learned nothing new about the DOJ's torture policy from the man holding the position of top law enforcer in the country.

Not that it came as a surprise. Aside from Mukasey's repeated suggestions that he may never answer whether waterboarding is torture, last night the senators received a letter from the Attorney General, in which he promised to answer their questions "to the best of my ability," but reserved the right to impose certain "limits" on his answers. "I recognize that those limits may make my task [before the committee] more difficult for me personally," he wrote. Nevertheless: "My job as attorney general is to do what I believe the law requires and what is best for the country, not what makes my life easier." (What a guy.)

That said, Mukasey said he has given the matter a lot of thought and has concluded that all the CIA's current interrogation techniques "comply with the law." Moreover, "I have been authorized to disclose publicly that waterboarding is not among those methods." At least, not at the moment. Should, however, waterboarding be officially re-introduced as an official interrogation technique, Mukasey explained:


"That process would begin with the C.I.A. director's determination that the addition of the technique was required for the program … Then the attorney general [Editor's Note: That's him!] would have to determine that the use of the technique is lawful under the particular conditions and circumstances proposed. Finally the president would have to approve of the use of the technique."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.