Former Sen. Kerrey Endorses Hillary, Then Repeats Lies About Obama's Childhood

Over the weekend, former Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.) raised a few eyebrows after an event in Iowa in which he endorsed Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. Kerrey, who's always had a reputation for pushing the rhetorical envelope with freewheeling and provocative remarks, offered some provocative comments about Barack Obama.

"It's probably not something that appeals to him, but I like the fact that his name is Barack Hussein Obama, and that his father was a Muslim and that his paternal grandmother is a Muslim. There's a billion people on the planet that are Muslims and I think that experience is a big deal."
Ostensibly, Kerrey was complimenting Obama, but at the same time, he was subtly hitting right-wing points, emphasizing Obama's middle name and family lineage. Whether one perceives this as a cheap, underhanded shot depends entirely on whether one is willing to give Kerrey the benefit of the doubt. (I couldn't help but find it a little odd, thought, that Kerrey knew, off the top of his head, that the senator's "paternal grandmother" was Muslim.) Was Kerrey trying to raise an issue while pretending not to raise it?

As I said yesterday, I don't want to get to a point in which every innocent comment is scrutinized for some kind of hidden agenda-driven meaning, but Kerrey decided to respond to the questions yesterday by making matters worse. He told CNN:
"I've watched the blogs try to say that you can't trust him because he spent a little bit of time in a secular madrassa. I feel quite the opposite -- I think it's a tremendous strength. Whether he's in the United States Senate or whether he's in the White House, I think it's a tremendous asset for him."
Oh my. First, it's not "the blogs," it's the broader right-wing smear machine. Second, Obama didn't spend any time in a "madrassa" -- that's been thoroughly debunked.

And third, by highlighting Obama's middle name, his Muslim relatives, and the "madrassa" nonsense, all after endorsing Clinton, it's getting harder and harder to give Kerrey the benefit of the doubt here.

Mark Kleiman's take seemed to strike the right note.
I was willing to give Bob Kerrey the benefit of the doubt about his "Barack Hussein Obama" comment. But if his "secular madrassa" comment wasn't a deliberate smear, then Kerrey must really and truly be as dimwitted as his detractors insist.
There are some people so nasty that they can't see a belt without wanting to hit below it. And there are others so verbally clumsy that they never open their mouths except for the purpose of inserting a foot. I'm not sure which one Kerrey is, but I'm sure glad he didn't get to be President.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.