Do the Police Have it out for O.J.?

O.J. Simpson screamed loud and long that anyone who thinks he'd be stupid enough to commit robbery in Las Vegas of all places has got to be nuts. The world's best known accused and acquitted double murder defendant seems to have a point. His mug is known far and wide, and any and everything he does generally makes news. And when it doesn't he makes sure that there's a sports card signing, a reality show pitch, or a self-confessional book to grab some headlines, and stir the public's hate-Simpson juices.

So why did Simpson, according to police, feel that he needed to charge into a hotel room and snatch and grab some sports memorabilia from two collectors, at gunpoint no less? Why not call the police if the items as he claims are his and have them recover them? Simpson says the explanation is simple. The police won't lift a finger to help him. That's a clumsy, but tactful way of saying that he's a marked man, and that police have had it in for him ever since he beat the double murder charge.

At first glance this seems to be the desperate rant of a guy who's prone to lie, cheat, and as most think, kill. But beyond his contention that he's innocent, Simpson also knows that playing the anti-police card might resonate if ever so slightly with some. There's no evidence at this stage of the case that Simpson was framed, or that Las Vegas police licked their chops at the thought of getting him back in a legal noose. He was at the hotel, the goods were taken, and a robbery complaint was filed.

Since the day that he beat the double murder rap and walked out of a Los Angeles court a decade ago, he has gone wherever he pleased and done what he pleased. He's at times been trailed by a pack of doting well-wishers of former fans and celebrity gawkers. There is no evidence that police in any of these cities have routinely subjected him to a special get-Simpson profile. Yet, Simpson is a target only in that because of his ill gained notoriety and perverse celebrity, the legal hammer would drop especially hard on him at the first whiff of criminal wrongdoing. There is little chance that Simpson, given the savage public mood toward him and the two person truth squad of Fred Goldman and Denise Brown continually wagging the guilt finger, would get the benefit of the doubt on any charges against him.

Simpson of all people should know that in any allegation of his involvement in a crime he'd get the fast collar. Since the bloody and mangled bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were found in the walkway of Simpson's Brentwood, California apartment a decade ago, it seems that time has stood still with him. Tongues still furiously wag at the mention of the murders. If a poll were taken today, a majority of the public will still rage that Simpson is a murderer who skipped away scot-free, and that the trial and his acquittal were a farce and a blatant travesty of justice. But there are also some who would contend that Simpson was victimized by a biased criminal justice system and the verdict to acquit was a just one.

Simpson didn't invent or originate this sometimes ugly divide in public opinion about celebrity guilt. It has always lurked just beneath the surface. But his case propelled it to the front of public debate and anger. The horde of Simpson media commentators, legal experts and politicians that branded the legal system corrupt fueled public belief that justice is for sale. Simpson's acquittal seemed to confirm that the rich, famous and powerful have the deep pockets to hire a small army of high-priced, high-profile attorneys, expert witnesses, experts and investigators that routinely mangle the legal system to stall, delay, drag out their cases and eventually allow their well-heeled clients to weasel out of punishment. Even when prosecutors manage to win convictions against celebrities such as Paris Hilton or Lindsey Lohan, their money, fame, power and legal twisting often guarantee that they will get a hand slap jail sentence, if that.

Whether the police did rush to judgment as Simpson claims -- and there's probably a little wiggle room to debate the magnitude of the charges -- and he eventually stands trial, the chatter from most will be that a killer is finally getting at least some of his due. Others will say that even Simpson can be a victim of a vindictive and unforgiving criminal justice system. The truth as always may lie somewhere between the two views. In any case, Simpson will do his best to make sure that an unbelieving world believes that even he can be falsely accused. A second non-trial of the century, anyone?

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.