Shockingly Predictable: White House Snubs Congress ... Again!

This post, by christy Hardin Smith, originally appeared on Firedoglake.

White House thumbs nose at yet another Congressional hearing. H/T to nolo for the find:

. . .Accordingly, we conclude that Mr. Rove is immune from compelled congressional testimony about matters (such as the U. S. Attorney resignations) that arose during his tenure as an immediate presidential adviser and that relate to his official duties in that capacity. Therefore, he is not required to appear in response to the Judiciary Committee subpoena to testify about such matters. . .
As nolo points out, they aren’t relying on any case law precedent to make this claim but, rather, a musty old memo that former Justice Rehnquist penned back in his DOJ days. Um…yeah…that’s some solid ground you found there. doofus.

More on this as I dig it up. In the meantime, the NYObserver has a piece on the Bush White House’s favorite nag:

In truth, the front-running Democratic candidates, all of whom favor a withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, are doing just fine ignoring Mr. Lieberman's electoral prescription. Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards all generally come out on top of the likely Republican nominees in polls measuring hypothetical match-ups between specific candidates. Moreover, with President Bush's approval ratings in the toilet--thanks mostly to Iraq--surveys show that voters lopsidedly prefer a generic, unnamed Democrat to an unnamed Republican for President.

In all, Mr. Lieberman's This Week appearance lasted about 11 minutes, and if anything became clear in that time it's how decreasingly relevant to the national political debate he's becoming--a decline that not many foresaw last November, when Connecticut's voters returned him to the Senate, prompting talk that a new power-broker, coveted equally by both parties, had been born.

Given the Senate's partisan balance--49 Republicans, 49 Democrats (one still recuperating from a December cerebral hemorrhage), and two tie-breaking independents who caucus with the Democrats--Democrats are still technically at Mr. Lieberman's mercy, their fragile control of the chamber dependent on his continued willingness to live up to his campaign pledge to side with his old party for organizational purposes.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.