ExxonMobil: Sex, Lies and Global Warming

On May 30th, at its annual meeting, the directors of ExxonMobil will ignore the shareholder request to change its employment policy to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation.

They promise they are doing the right thing without any added rules.

They also have promised for years that global warming is the machination of crazy scientists out of touch with reality. They have lobbied hard -- and successfully -- against the U.S. signing the Kyoto Protocol. Rules. Why have rules when there is 40 billion dollars of profit to be had?

This February, The New York Times reported CEO Rex Tillerson, "warned Tuesday that governments should not rush into policies that could damage the global economy in order to limit carbon emissions."

Maybe when Rex can chip off some iceberg for his martini from his deck in West Palm Beach he might think stepping up efforts will be a good idea.

Over 85 percent of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have 98 percent of Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign. And yet, ever the spoiled child, ExxonMobil continues to claim their policies, without the explicit language, are good enough.

Former CEO Lee Raymond was the poster child for aggressive, antagonistic business practices with a complete disregard for anyone and anything except the carefully watched bottom line. The man felt humiliating shareholders at the annual meeting was not only completely acceptable but his right. Call me a pessimist, but I don't believe it was the kind of leadership that inspires respect in the workplace.

Oddly, before the merger of Exxon and Mobil in 1998, Mobil did, in fact, have a non-discrimination policy that included sexual orientation. Unlike the merger of Lotus and IBM, where IBM embraced the policies of the smaller, more progressive company, Exxon removed the policy.

If, as the company claims in its proxy response, "ExxonMobil's existing global policies prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in any Company workplace, anywhere in the world," why the opposition?

Even though Raymond is gone and a smoother, more polished Tillerson has taken over, the rhetoric is pretty much the same. While Raymond was famous for his sneering, vocal disregard of the rest of the world, Tillerson is saying all the same things.

Only in a much nicer suit.

Tillerson claims to accept the planet is warming, maybe a little tiny bit, his company is completely and exclusively invested in continuing to pump as much oil from the earth as possible. No need for rules and regulations -- they hurt profits and you know 40 billion isn't quite enough to cover his latest salary increase.

No need to add those pesky extra words to the EEO policy. Why subject yourself to possible litigation? God knows the legal department's hands are full enough trying to avoid paying out a single penny for the Valdez settlement.

Next Wednesday, Tillerson and the board of directors will ignore 15 of the 17 resolutions brought before them. With million dollar smiles, they'll promise to do the right thing.

And insist there is no need for rules, standards or evaluation.

It is a fact that ExxonMobil removed existing protections for gay and lesbian employees of the Mobil Corporation. Enough with the song and dance. Stop with the lies and misinformation.

Change the policy.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.