What happened when Bush spoke at Ft. Benning?

In a post on the WSJ.com, picked up by rightwing "watchdogs" Newsbusters, James Taranto spies conflicting reports of Bush's January 11th speech: "Are There Two Different Fort Bennings?"

An AP report says Bush was "cheered" (the reason for speaking at a military base) while the NY Times calls the base "subdued."

In case Taranto's being too subtle: THE LIBERAL MEDIA LED BY THE NY TIMES IS AGAINST THE PRESIDENT.

(By the way, the WaPo corroborates the "subdued" characterization, calling it a "quiet response.")

Of course, the problem with this meme, aside from the fact that it rests on a flabby book by a lonely conservative, is that the lib'rul portion of the media is a somewhat squirrely entity. As in: the AP was the target just a few short weeks ago. Until the right got burned -- severely -- on that one.

So now the AP's the good guys. But wait! Not so fast, the AP seems to have produced two reports from that one speech. The other makes no mention of cheering or not cheering.

But let's put aside the question over whether Bush was cheered or not cheered, what constitutes a cheer, are they waves or particles? etc, and focus on the element of the story obscured by what does appear to be a reporting problem on the AP's part.

The fact that, as NPR reported, "After the president's speech, the commanding general barred soldiers from talking to reporters."

Cheering may -- MAY -- have a subjective quality to it.

Cowardice, less so. Bush is too scared to listen to the soldiers he commands. And that speaks volumes.

#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}