Monty Python on Iraq's cost...

Terry Jones Monty Python-izes Bush's Iraq war in his latest Guardian column.

Noting that Bush is about to ask congress for $100 billion more (for the onerous task of making life intolerable for the Iraqis ), he asks what American voters would've chosen between receiving $1600 each and bombing a country "that doesn't use lavatory paper?"

Jones then asks what it would've done for international terrorism to have given every Iraqi $18,700, as opposed to "bombing the hell out of them." I'll tell you: very little in the short term.

I know he's being somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but Saddam's and Iraq's connections to international terrorism were gauzy -- at best. A real change in Iraq would've been good for overall stability and hope in the Middle East, but let's get real: there was no appreciable terrorism there...

Phew, k. Back to Monty Python.

Wryly claiming that "the US is the flagship of monetary common sense," Jones points out that Iraq spending bills whooshed through the Republican-led congress (with little to no resistance from a quivering Dem minority) with no provision for accounting. That's right, they stripped oversight from the bill.

I know. You're shocked.

Then comes the most grisly statistic. Remember, this is a satirist:

What's more, with over half a million dead, it means that the world's greatest military superpower has spent a million dollars for every Iraqi killed.
Sometimes it takes a cold-blooded satire to flip a certain switch in the old noodle. We've created a moral and fiscal disaster over there so we could avoid dealing with the one at home...

Read the whole column HERE.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.