Democracy -- Shamocracy

Democracy is supposed to be about ordinary people, common folk, having a say-so in the decisions that shape their lives; the idea that there's an "inalienable right" to certain freedoms; that the only legitimate government is one that answers to "the people." In democracies, people are not subjects, but citizens.


Raed Jarrar, the Iraq project director for Global Exchange, a human rights organization, who has spent a lot of time talking to members of Iraq's parliament, points out how the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend the occupation force in Iraq. The security council voted with the quickness after Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki requested the extension.

U.S. and British "diplomats" rushed the vote through last month, even though it wasn't on the council's agenda for November.

"The Iraqi parliament was not informed about this (request) by al-Maliki. I talked to four Iraqi MPs: a Sunni, a Shia, and two seculars, and all of them were totally shocked that al-Maliki bypassed the Iraqi parliament."

Dr. Hajim al-Hassani, a Sunni secular MP and the former speaker of parliament, told Jarrar: "We were supposed to have a meeting with al-Maliki and other top officials in the parliament during the next couple of weeks to decide what to do with the mandate."

"According to most of the MPs I talked to," Jarrar continues, "it is unconstitutional to have the prime minister renewing the mandate without consulting the Iraqi parliament."


A recent poll conducted by The Program on International Policy Attitudesfound that three of four Americans believe that in order to stabilize Iraq, U.S. policymakers should engage Iran and Syria in talks and eight in 10 support an international conference on Iraq.

A majority of Americans oppose keeping U.S. forces in Iraq indefinitely and instead support a timetable for withdrawal within two years or less, which is in line with several key proposals of the Iraq Study Group.

That's probably because most Americans understand the we-don't-negotiate-with-terrorists line is nonsense, especially since Reagan negotiated with Iranian "terrorists" for the release of U.S. hostages and, as James Baker noted, "we talked to the Soviets for 40 years when they were trying to blow us up." Baker emphasized that it's not a sign of weakness to talk to your adversaries. After all, peace is made with enemies; not friends. Interestingly, U.S. public opinion is similar to Iraqi public opinion. Sure, there are those true believers who cling to neocon myths about Iraq and avoid serious thinking by writing all this off as "liberal" propaganda.

OK, well check out what the very conservative Cato Institute has to say.

"A new, extensive survey of Iraqi public opinion conducted by Gallup and other groups discredits numerous cherished beliefs that hawks have held about Iraq."

"For months, the Bush administration and its supporters have argued that there is a silent majority of Iraqis who regard coalition forces as liberators, want those forces to stay for a prolonged period, oppose insurgent attacks on coalition troops, and are enthusiastic about creating a Western-style democracy for their country. The poll results contradict every one of those assumptions."

The poll found that 57 percent of Iraqis want U.S. troops out "immediately." Though only 3 percent of Kurds want the forces to depart immediately, 61 percent of Shiites and 65 percent of Sunnis -- the ones who have the most to lose by U.S. withdrawal -- want to see a quick U.S. exit strategy.

In Baghdad, where U.S. troop presence is more visible and concentrated, 75 percent of the city's residents want the U.S. out ASAP. Where the violence is at its worst, three-quarters of the population don't feel protected or liberated by U.S. forces.

Democracy and freedom? Yeah, right.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.