A response to Cenk Uygur: How ‘bout we don’t use any weapon against Iran?

Cenk's a good guy, so when I say that I must respectfully disagree with his post from yesterday, I mean it.

Cenk makes the point that we don't need to bomb Iran, and suggests we learn from past experience that the spread of capitalism is our best "weapon" for getting recalcitrant countries to see things our way.

I find five problems with his argument. It assumes that we need a weapon of some sort to use against Iran; it rests heavily on the oft-cited but problematic "democratic peace theory"; it misrepresents that theory and conflates democracy with capitalism; it draws a faulty historical analogue between Iran and Vietnam and it assumes that "our" model of capitalism has proven its capacity to bring about stability.

One at a time…


Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.