UPDATED: White powder terrorist of Jon Stewart, Letterman, Pelosi...

Yes, it appears that Chad Conrad Castagana, the man "suspected of mailing more than a dozen threatening letters containing white powder to Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Jon Stewart and other high-profile figures," was a conservative and a commenter on conservative blogs. Unless there are two Chad Castaganas:

He also appears to have been a frequenter of Right Wing sewer, The Free Republic.

Heavens. What does it mean?!

Hardly anything; let the witch hunt end here, please. Liberal blogs, not a monolithic entity in the first place, aren't, as Fox's new talking head (former Maxim Pimp Greg Gutfeld) claimed, "sending the same message as terrorists."

Just as conservative blogs, like "Expose the Left," aren't necessarily promoting terrorism, as has been allegedly committed by Chad Castagana.


Wackos attach themselves to any perspective and take it to the extreme. A**holes blame the most salient representatives of a given perspective for the actions of their most radical adherents for political gain.

UPDATE: Domestic Terrorism expert David Neiwert has responded to the evidence that's pouring in from all corners about Castagana and his love for Conservative commentators. Noting that prominent pushers of hatred are somewhat culpable, he writes:
[M]entally unstable types are almost always stirred up and driven to their insane acts by haters of various stripes, the kind whose voices seem each day to be growing louder in our public discourse. These cultural vampires have developed a real knack for inspiring mentally unstable people into horrific acts of violence.
Haters like the people Castagana claims as his heroes -- Coulter, Malkin, Ingraham, just for starters -- are constantly engaging in the worst kind of eliminationist rhetoric directed primarily at liberals. It is simply an inevitability that, when this kind of hate is broadcast to millions of people daily, some of them are eventually going to start acting it out in fashions precisely like this. And worse.
Absolutely agreed. My original post was a bit more contrarian than I would've liked -- although, to be fair, the full range of his love for the Tipsy Chicks had yet to be discovered.

Still and all, my point wasn't that every event takes place in a vacuum, that we're all independent agents, but rather that blogs, as opposed to other mediums (I sic myself) bear no more or less responsibility for their readers than networks, newspapers or magazines bear for theirs. Which is to say: some.

And on that note, I agree once more with Neiwert that it's past time to hold media executives and producers responsible for the voices they amplify... (C&L, Nitpicker, ExposeTheLeft, Orcinus)

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.