Populism for anti-populists

I second Ezra, who says:

If you want to know why I think the hype about Mark Warner oddly misguided, look no further than his recent comments lambasting the Kerry campaign for targeting Bush's top-bracket tax cuts as poor strategy. He takes up that favorite of chin-stroking op-ed columnists everywhere to argue that "Even though the Bush tax cuts only applied to the top 2 percent of Americans, what I think the Kerry campaign missed was that the other 98 percent of Americans still aspired to get to the point in their life."
Color me unconvinced.
…[W]hile Warner's genial rejection of class warfare may play well on the Washington Post op-ed page, there's no reason to believe it a good strategy, and lord knows it's terrible policy, particularly in an era when the federal treasury is starved for revenue and Democrats actually want to enact some social programs.
Ezra calls it anti-populism, but it's really more like Populism Reloaded, because it's not anti-populism so much as populism for social Darwinists. Specifically, poor and uneducated social Darwinists who are too ignorant to realize that they're consistently voting against their own best interests, since progressive policies facilitate upward mobility, not conservative ones. The vast majority of the supposed "other 98 percent of Americans" who still aspire "to get to the point in their life where they could qualify for the tax cuts" won’t ever get there, and constructing policy around the foolishness of people* who can't discern the difference between reality and an illusory promise that will never be fulfilled is madness. In fact, it's precisely the kind of madness in policymaking which has served as the foundation of Bush's entire presidency.

If that's the best Warner's got, color me unconvinced, too.


* And, as Ezra points out, the polling doesn't even seem to indicate that there are as many people as Warner seems to think who are that foolish in the first place.

(Ezra Klein)

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.