"Your argument makes no sense"

News & Politics

U.S. Circuit Judge Harry T. Edwards didn't mince words when dealing with government lawyers from the Federal Communications Commission who were trying to justify why they've been evesdropping, without a warrant, into thousands of Internet communications.

Judge Edwards called thier arguments "gobbledygook" and "nonsense" while addressing the serious breach of civil liberties caused by the snooping.

The case is being heard by a three judge panel that will determine whether new FCC rules [PDF] are constitutional, including the provision that the government can require providers of Internet phone service and broadband services to ensure their equipment can accommodate police wiretaps.

The third Judge on the panel, Janice Rogers Brown, is a Bush favorite who was considered on the short list for a Supreme Court nomination. She was utterly silent during the arguments.

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}