Will DC finally get some Rep?

I went to highschool in Washington, DC. And my family still lives there. I follow its local politics, which are fascinating -- I suppose like all local politics to local residents -- and for 13 years I've watched the DC statehood movement crawl along at a glacial pace (Activist Sam Smith provides fantastic history of it).

It looks like something's about to happen. DC could get a Representative in Congress... but it's a shady deal that will likely prevent statehood and two senators in the upper house (not that I think that even this would amounts to true representation or functioning government).

Jonathan Singer at MyDD links to a Post article with the latest:


A congressional committee overwhelmingly approved a bill yesterday that would grant the District a permanent, full voting member of the House of Representatives and add another legislator from Utah.
The House Committee on Government Reform voted 29 to 4 in favor of the proposal sponsored by its chairman, Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.). The measure now goes to the House Judiciary Committee, whose chairman has agreed to bring it up for a vote.
Davis said he thought the legislation could be approved by the full Congress this year. But congressional aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, were more cautious.
They noted that the Judiciary Committee is busy with other issues and might need time to analyze changes Davis recently made to his bill. In particular, to gain Democratic support, Davis agreed that the extra House seat going to Utah would be at-large, to avoid redrawing a district held by a Democrat.
Singer asks all the right questions:

"--Will passage of the Davis legislation inhibit the effort of granting DC full statehood -- with two Senators as well as a Representative -- rather than move it forward?
--Is it constitutional for Congress to mandate that the seat given to Utah be at-large? Unless I'm mistaken, the manner by which members are elected to the House (i.e. the designation of districts) is decided by the state government, not the federal government. If the measure is not clearly constitutional, what assurances can be given to Democrats that the Utah legislature won't redraw districts mid-census to gerrymander Democrat Jim Matheson out of office?
--How will Davis' measure affect DC's electoral votes? How will it effect those of Utah? Will it be the case that DC's electoral votes stay at 3 - which would seem to make sense - while Utah's increase by one, thus giving the GOP an extra electoral vote?"

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.