Someone finally gets Colbert right.

And, more importantly, gets liberals' reactions to the coverage of Colbert's performance right. It is, of all people, Doug Elfman, a television critic for the Chicago Sun-Times.


How did Bush tickle reporters? He made fun of the fact that he can barely speak English (he is quite simply the worst communicator of all U.S. presidents), that our vice president is a heartless face-shooter, and that Bush is basically an idiot.
Ha ha, our "war president" knows he's a village idiot? To members of the White House press corps, that's some real funny stuff. To non-insiders, this looked like another example of good old boys and gals slapping each other on the back.
Colbert's routine was more remarkable for its unique and creative brazenness. He joked that Bush's presidency is like the Hindenburg; that Bush's wiretappers were monitoring this very event, and that the White House press corps, sitting in front of Colbert, gave Bush a free pass, scandal after scandal, until recently (when his polls numbers dropped).
How's this for a newsworthy lead? It was perhaps the first time in Bush's tenure that the president was forced to sit and listen to any American cite the litany of criminal and corruption allegations that have piled up against his administration.
Spot-on. But what member of the MSM, except for perhaps Helen Thomas, could write that lead without shouldering some of the blame for leaving Bush snuggly protected inside his precious bubble? And that's the real story, which, of course, the press refuses to write. They don't just admire Bush; they've aped his shtick--staying the course, eschewing accountability, and refusing to apologize for their own failures. It's oh so much easier to cast liberals as crazy-rabid-irrational, so much easier to write about imaginary reasons for their anger, or pretend there aren't any and it's all just so much delusional madness. As Toast said in Shakes’ comments, "They simply cannot get past the fact that we're pissed off and address the bill of specifics that has us so pissed off." Exactly right.

Elfman goes on to critique the conservativization of the mainstream news, noting, "To liberals, this must be somewhat puzzling, since the rest of the conservative media primarily sides with a president whose approval ratings stand at 32 percent, a whisker better than Nixon's before he resigned in disgrace." Too true. At least, it used to be puzzling. Now it's all too easy to see why refuse to deviate from their sorry tale--they were wrong; wrong about Bush, wrong about Iraq, wrong to indulge "the most powerfully staged photo ops in the world," wrong to shill at every turn for an administration that's bad bad bad for America. And we--the raging, frothing, mad-haired loonies--were right.

(Crossposted at Shakespeare’s Sister.)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).
#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.