The Constitutional rights of rapists

CORRECTION: In this post I confused the earlier case out of Chicago and this most recent one in California. My apologies to all who were, understandably confused!

Each case included the alleged rape of a girl, now 20, by three men who videotaped the assault. A sickening convergence of events, to be sure, but with different results.

2 of the 3 defendants in the Chicago case were actually acquitted, despite the videotape showing that she was extremely drunk, despite the fact that when it was over she "was spit on repeatedly and sexual slurs were scrawled on her legs and abdomen with markers."



I thought "she wanted it" was relegated to the dustbin of tasteless jokes and archaic stereotypes.

Last week PEEK posted a disturbing item about a 16-year-old girl who faced a possible jail term for refusing to watch herself get raped on video. The defense claimed that it was a violation of his client's Constitutional rights for her to refuse. The judge ordered her to watch under threat of incarceration.

Quite possibly due to the ensuing public outcry, the judge then reversed this judgment, allowing the girl to forgo the act of reliving her rape.

Was the defense finished? Nope.

After one witness admitted to "alter[ing] her written statement to help the defense just four days before the first trial," and after others had trouble keeping their stories straight, the defense was left arguing that most tenuous of arguments... she wanted it.

But then, after a devastating emotional statement from the victim, the defense did an about-face, according to Pinko Feminist Hellcat: "Suddenly, they felt the need to discredit her assertion that her emotional problems were largely a result of the rape."

PFH then responds: "Wait! Didn't she actively participate? Didn't she want this? Now you admit that you're full of crap and a lying sack of beetledung..."

In any case, it didn't fly. The three shown in the video received 6-year sentences with no probation. (PFH)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.