alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Information 'highway' or information 'Safeway'?

Cross-posted in PEEK and The Mix.

To put it simply, your ability to access your favorite websites is in danger.

In this week's New Yorker, James Surowiecki pens one of the most comprehensible and sensible pieces on net neutrality yet. It begins with a bit of little-known 'history':
In the first decades of the twentieth century, as a national telephone network spread across the United States, A.T. & T. adopted a policy of "tiered access" for businesses. Companies that paid an extra fee got better service: their customers’ calls went through immediately, were rarely disconnected, and sounded crystal-clear. Those who didn’t pony up had a harder time making calls out, and people calling them sometimes got an "all circuits busy" response. Over time, customers gravitated toward the higher-tier companies and away from the ones that were more difficult to reach. In effect, A.T. & T.’s policy turned it into a corporate kingmaker.
This never happened, of course, and the reason it didn't is because telephone service was treated as a utility and not strictly as a commodity. Phone companies were required to give you, your grandma, or your teensy small business the same service as the Carnegies or the Rockefellers.

Part of the internet's success has been due to the fact that Melissa McEwan's Shakespeare's Sister blog has been given the same service as FoxNews.com (though at present there's no government regulation of taste or intellect to govern how many people attempt to access these sites).

The phone companies' demands to allow "tiered access" (you pay more, you get better service) will give them more revenue to improve the whole system, they say, and besides, they claim, "they have no plans to block access or degrade service to those who don’t pay a premium rate."

This defies logic: if someone gets better service then the others get worse service. By definition this is true. Surowiecki writes:
"All bits of data have been treated similarly, just as the highway system doesn’t allow trucks from some companies to go faster than others, and the electrical grid does not deliver reliable power to some customers and erratic service to others."
But the companies are hoping to frame the debate as a free-market issue. If Safeway can offer premium shelf space to manufacturers who pay for it, why can't internet providers do the same, they argue. This system, while perhaps bringing a highly functioning internet, will perhaps not bring a highly functional one as "Decisions that once were made collectively by hundreds of millions of Internet users would now be shaped in large part by a handful of telecom executives."

For the millionth time: information is not a commodity like tea biscuits or canned pineapple. It's absolutely crucial to a successful democracy.

In April, there's Pulver Media's Freedom to Connect Conference (F2C), dedicated to the idea that "Freedom to Connect belongs with Freedom of Speech, Press, Religion and Assembly," and that "if some connectivity is good, then more connectivity is better."

Also, Ron Wyden (D-OR) has sponsored a bill that would make network neutrality the law, commenting that "Creating a two-tiered system could have a chilling effect on small mom and pop businesses that can’t afford the priority lane, leaving these smaller businesses no hope of competing against the Wal-Marts of the world..."

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close