Phyllis Schlafly is a Lunatic

LeMew passed on this post by Roger Ailes critiquing a recent column of Schlafly’s at TownHall (to which I refuse to link; you can click through at Rog’s place if you’re so inclined). Although I, like Rog, have no insight on the merits of the case being discussed--that of a man who was prosecuted for spousal rape--and therefore couldn’t begin to agree or disagree with Schlafly’s assessment, I will comment on this little chestnut, a critique of which isn’t predicated on one’s opinion of the underlying case:
A man's life has been sacrificed, and three children have been denied their father by malicious feminists who have lobbied for laws that punish spousal rape just like stranger rape and deny a man the right to cross-examine his accuser. They have created a judicial system where the woman must always be believed even though she has no evidence, one in which the man is always guilty.
boing boing clunk

Just ignore that. It was just my eyeballs popping out of my skull and my head hitting the desk.

In what kind of twisted loopyland does this broad live that rape at the hands of one’s spouse is somehow less noxious than rape at the hands of a stranger? Even the narrowest reading of "honor and obey” surely doesn’t include submitting to sex against one’s will as part of the wifely duty. Good lord. But don’t bother listening to this malicious feminist and rape-resistant wife. I’ll turn it over to the guys:

Yes, the testimony of a woman is not evidence. And rape is not rape. And protecting rape victims equally is malice…
It's amusing to see Schafly make all the arguments about the criminal justice system that are usually ridiculed by purported law-and-order types -- unless it's a Republican on trial. Or it would be if Schlafly's arguments weren't a transparent excuse to pen another column displaying her contempt for women.
Oh my, those mean feminists and their crazy ideas about how "just because you've married someone doesn't give them the right to rape you at any time"! You can't get more "malicious" than that! As for the closing empirical claim, sadly, no.
It's really hard to overstate what an odious figure Schlafly is; killing the ERA is just the beginning.
Sigh. I can’t even believe that retrograde reprobate and I reside in the same universe.

(Lawyers, Guns & Money, Roger Ailes)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.