60 Minutes is unbalanced

Because of the nearly comatose levels of thought devoted to the concept of balance in journalism, we've somehow inched our way into a bizzarro world where one dissenting voice actually must be presented next to an overwhelming majority in order to maintain balance.

60 Minutes roundly rejected that idiocy this week in its report on Global Warming. Good for them. According to Chris Mooney:


Brian Montopoli, of CBS's "Public Eye," talked with Scott Pelley recently about his "60 Minutes" global warming special. Pelley explains that he deliberately did not talk to those voices who remain skeptical of the science: "It would be irresponsible of us to go find some scientist somewhere who is not thought of as being eminent in the field and put him on television with these other guys to cast doubt on what they're saying."
Amen.

Mooney actually believes they should feature the dissenting scientist but to contextualize his argument as a way to demonstrate just how outside the mainstream it really is.

His commenter Coby disagrees arguing that: "[to] try to contextualize it in a (deservedly) nagative way would come off as defensive and *still* give his opinions more exposure than the deserve." Thoughts? Is it a framing no-no to even dignify apocryphal science with airtime?

Update: See first comment below from theywillknowusbyourabsurdity for a note on the segment's nod to the skeptics... (TheIntersection)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).
#story_page_ below_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.