When is a law not a law

Bush signing on Friday of the the torture ban ammendment sponsored by Senator John McCain and others was a bit anticlimactic. Especially because, in doing so, he pulled the presidential equivilant of the school yard fingers crossed behind the back. Bush issued a "signing statement," which basically asserted that the law was fine and good, it just didn't apply to him.

A senior administration official later confirmed to the Boston Globe that the president believes the Constitution gives him the power to authorize interrogation techniques that go beyond the law to protect national security. Yes, but the president also believes that God wanted him to be President. Believing something doesn't make it real, and certainly doesn't make it legal.

Three Republican Senators who helped sponsor the bill, John W. Warner Jr., John McCain, and Lindsey Graham, harshly criticized Bush's "signing statement." My question why did they agree to the wording changes that made the ammendment palatable to Bush in the first place? Bush had initially said he would veto the anti-torture legislation. A last-minute language compromise, which kept the words "cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment" but shifted some of the other language, had Bush agreeing to sign the bill. McCain had said he "wouldn't compromise on torture," but in meeting with the Bush administration and tweaking the bill unti it was something the White House said it could accept, he did just that.

Of course it's not fair to blame McCain. An actual veto of the bill, instead of signing it with one hand while denying it with the other, would have forced Bush to admit how far down a moral hole he's gone and that would have been out of character.

What could have been a showdown over the Bush administration's willingness to use torture, became instead another example of Bush's ability to get away with murder.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.