Return of Abu Ghraib

Remember Gen. Geoffrey Miller? He used to be in charge of Guantanamo. He was widely disrespected by military intelligence folks at Gitmo because he was an infantry officer who had little or no intelligence experience. Yet, there he was. Implementing such brilliant tactics as the use of dogs to threaten prisoners.

His work done there, Miller was shuffled on to Abu Ghraib to reform intelligence-gathering -- Guantanamo-style. He was a raving success at transferring techniques as evidenced by the Abu Ghraib photos. So, following the preceding logic, he was promoted again. Miller is currently a senior official at the Pentagon, in charge of managing Army installations.

Not the kind of guy who seems to have much to worry about, despite the obvious wrongdoing. And yet, he might still have the fear of God (er, more accurately, prison) in him. Today, the WaPo reports that Miller "invoked his right not to incriminate himself in court-martial proceedings against two soldiers accused of using dogs to intimidate captives at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq."

Eugene Fidell, military law expert, says that this is "consistent with his being concerned that he may have some exposure to worry about. It's very unusual for senior officers to invoke their Article 31 rights. The culture in the military tends to encourage cooperation."

Hunh. Might this have something to do with the fact that Miller just found out that Col. Thomas M. Pappas, commanding officer of Abu Ghraib accepted immunity from prosecution, "and was ordered to testify at upcoming courts-martial" where he "could be asked to detail high-level policies relating to the treatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib." That might point right to Miller.

It's likely that nothing big will come of this. But it's still nice to see people who think they're above the law quake a little in their boots.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.