Don't Test on Me

Do you remember the ill-fated "nuclear option" that would have ended filibustering as we knew it? A while back, I wrote that the greatest defense of the nuclear option was its own name. Republicans were going to have to defeat "nuclear option" before they could actually get rid of it. And they couldn't, and so we never even had to engage in a serious debate about ending the filibuster. Of course, there were some other things that saved it, but... "nuclear" figured into it heavily.

The same phenomenon applies to "human pesticide tests." Try all the Bush administration might, even as the executive branch rises to the "zenith" of its powers, I'll still take anyone to Las Vegas on a bet over the possibility of using results from human pesticide tests to establish public health standards. California Public Interest Research Group is leading the fight on this one, and it shall win. Clinton's EPA banned this in 1998, and the Bushies are seeking to restore it.

Here's a dose of the argument against it:


Pesticide companies like Amvac Chemical have paid “volunteers” to drink or otherwise expose themselves to doses of toxic pesticides, including one derived from World War II nerve gases ....
If only all our battles were this easy.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close