Say What? The John Harris edition

If you're not already up to speed on the Froomkin saga -- for a saga it has undeniably become -- the details and links are here.

The latest development falls in the realm of pure comedy as political editor John Harris -- the man most unhappy with Froomkin for tainting the Post's White House reporters with his ugly partisanship -- tries to justify his claim that Froomkin's column suffers from a liberal bias. In his interview with Rosen yesterday, Harris couldn't come up with a single shred of evidence of Froomkin's liberal bias other than citing a "conservative blogger" named Patrick Ruffini.

Turns out Ruffini isn't just any old rightwing blogger but the E-campaign director for the RNC. Here's Brad deLong asking Harris to clarify his statement:


Q: Can you give any examples--other than Republican National Committee eCampaign Director Patrick Ruffini --of people who are seriously confused about Dan Froomkin's role at WPNI?
A: I cannot comment for the record because I've promised I won't comment on this.
Q: Did you, when you sent your answers to Jay Rosen yesterday, know that your "grassroots conservative weblogger" Patrickk Ruffini had been a Republican campaign operative in 2004?
A: I cannot comment for the record because I've promised that I won't comment on this.
Q: Did you, when you sent your answers to Jay Rosen yesterday, know that your "grassroots conservative weblogger" Patrick Ruffini was now eCampaign Director for the Republican National Committee?
A: I cannot comment for the record because I've promised that I won't comment on this. [Brad DeLong]
Somewhere in the White House, Scott Mclellan is laughing very, very hard.

Brad has his own theories about Harris' tap-dancing here.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close