Nobody Knows Anything

Louis Menand reviews Philip Tetlock’s new book, “Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?” in the current issue of the New Yorker.

Kevin Drum summarizes some key points: Tetlock, a psychology professor at UC Berkeley, found that experts are no better than ordinary people at predicting political events. However, some people are better predictors than others. The best predictors tend to be "foxes"--people with a flexible approach to problem solving who can integrate multiple sources of information.

Poor political forecasters tend to be "hedgehogs" who see the world in terms of one big thing (an ideology, a grand plan, etc.). The worst predictors are also the most confident about their predictions.

[Political Animal]

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.