It WAS a chemical weapon...

In the ever-evolving picture of White Phosphorous use in Iraq, we're currently at: Yes it was used on humans, yes it's a chemical weapon, and no the Pentagon can't be sure that no civilians were effected.

I was even duped myself. In a post to the Mix yesterday I noted that we may need to start using more specific -- and graphic -- language to describe despicable behavior that may not technically be illegal. Like, for instance, whether WP is a chemical weapon (and therefore prohibited) or not, "flesh-melting" weapons are repugnant and should do the trick.

I was wrong. Nico writes: "A formerly classified 1995 Pentagon intelligence document titled 'Possible Use of Phosphorous Chemical' describes the use of white phosphorus by Saddam Hussein on Kurdish fighters:

I know, Playing politics with munitions that mutilate humans. You're shocked. (ThinkProgress)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.