On Roberts, confirmed 78-22

The WaPo has the roll vote.

I haven't written much about the Roberts confirmation hearings because I agreed with everyone who thought it was a sure thing from the get-go.

But I didn't agree with the prevailing wisdom about why it was a sure thing.

It wasn't because I thought he was a moderate, or that he was going to show judicial restraint, or because he's a darn nice, good-looking, all-American fellow.

And I certainly didn't think it was his record that would get him through easily. He barely had a record and that should have raised the hackles right there.

This was a guy who was grown in some sort of protein medium in a pod in the basement of the Heritage Foundation and groomed his whole life to get through a confirmation hearing.

I thought it was a sure thing because from the get-go he was described as a Washington insider, a favorite on the cocktail circuit and a guy with friends on both sides of the aisle.

That means that he was always going to be covered by the DC beat reporters from the WaPo and the New York Times as a moderate who was going to show judicial restraint and is a darn nice, good-looking, all-American fellow.

The fix was in on this one from the start.

Too bad only 22 Dems had enough conviction to see past all that and vote no.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.