Rearranging the media's deck chairs

"I can understand why the White House might want the American public to be talking about Judith Miller instead of the larger story about someone in the White House breaking the law to crush a political opponent. But I do not understand why the media prefers to talk about Judith Miller over what appears to be the first wave of a Watergate type scandal," writes Jeffrey Feldman.

"Apathy? Disbelief?

Actually, I don't think those are the reasons. What we are seeing in this total silence from the press on a scandal of Watergate proportions, is the Dan Rather Effect on the media." Read on to learn about the Dan Rather Effect. (Frameshop)

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.