It's Iraq, stupid.

From a blogger friend of Peek, below is a report of a curious "hitch" in NPR's Morning Edition broadcast on the London attacks.

(Note: I called NPR's "communications services" to ask about the hitch but a very friendly and helpful Chad Campbell informed me that I'd have to listen to NPR's online archives from today's Morning Edition myself to confirm or deny the story as the news division is, quite understandably, busy. Thus far I've listened to every program and haven't found any interview with an on-the-street Londoner as described by The Baron's blog post):

At around 7:50 a.m. PST, NPR's Morning Edition host Lynn Neary was interviewing a male Londoner who was an eyewitness to aftermath of one of the four bombings in London today. In response to her question about how Londoners felt their police and emergency response services performed, he started to answer that they had expected an attack like this for some time since 9/11, and that many citizens like himself were surprised that an attack like this hadn't happened sooner because of Tony Blair's strong support for Bush's policies in Afghanistan and Iraq.

He was speaking calmly and sounded like he was honestly trying to answer her question, rather than trying to merely inject his political views, but before he could finish his sentence, Lynn Neary cut him off and NPR went to a muzak version of Queen's "We Are the Champions" for about 2 minutes. NPR's coverage then began again with an interview with US Senator Sam Brownback. For the previous 50 minutes that I had been listening to their coverage they had no technical difficulties despite the breaking nature of the story and the various live feeds they had to cut away to in England.
Though there may be other explanations for why NPR cut the man off, the situation fairly cries out that NPR did not want the eyewitness' views to be expressed. This bodes terribly for NPR as a reliable news source and suggests that the conservatives whose agenda has been to paint NPR as "liberal" have had a chilling effect on the range of opinion they can express. It is apalling to hear something so nakedly censored on NPR, which is supposed to be the standard-bearer of the mainstream media. Hopefully NPR's ombudsman will hear complaints on this and NPR will be called to account for this.
Here's another observation regarding NPR's reluctance to broadcast the perspective that participation in the Iraq War has directly led to terrorist bombings.

Harvard's Jessica Stern, interviewed by NPR's Lynn Neary about the attacks, was asked about London's preparedness. Stern responded that London was perhaps better prepared than any other European city as they've been expecting this for some time. They've been on "tenterhooks," she said.

Rather than ask the obvious follow up, or: 'why might London be on tenterhooks,' Neary asked whether there's any similarity between these attacks and those in Madrid. Again, an obvious piece of any answer to this question might include the fact that these were two of the largest supporters of the Iraq War -- that the UK is the largest supporter of the US war.

But Stern only responded that the m.o. of each was consistent. Important, to be sure, but c'mon, it doesn't take a Harvard professor to speculate that London might well be paying the price for supporting Bush's war.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.