Aww c'mon, Iraq ain't that bad.

"After reading the following story a few moments ago, I had to do about 120 seconds worth of research to call bullshit on this whining pack of lies. I only hope an intrepid ‘defense reporter’ will do the same," writes Richard Cranium.

The risk to National Guard soldiers of getting killed or wounded in Iraq or Afghanistan has been exaggerated, making recruiting more difficult, the general in charge of all National Guard forces said Tuesday.

...‘It is dangerous, but it is — I shouldn't say it to this group but I'm going to — it is misrepresented, how dangerous it really is,’ he said.

The casualty rate for Guardsmen is ‘remarkably low,’ compared with any previous armed conflict, Blum said, adding that he recognizes that every individual loss is a tragedy for that person's family. ‘But I lose, unfortunately, more people through private automobile accidents and motorcycle accidents over the same period of time,' he added.’

"You're right about one thing, Gen. Blum - you shouldn't outright lie to any group, much less a group of ‘defense reporters’... What fucking alternate universe do people like Blum live in? It took me all of 120 seconds to come up with these statistics:

Vietnam Conflict:

  • 58,193 KIA
  • 97 were National Guard
  • 1.6% was the death rate for National Guardsmen in Vietnam

Iraq Quagmire:
  • 1,750 KIA
  • 262 were National Guard
  • 14.9% is the death rate for National Guardsmen in Iraq

I swear, I'm going to scream if I read or hear another wingnut comparing Baghdad to Houston, or equating blown up, unarmored Humvees in a combat zone to an accident while joyriding on a Kawasaki.

Gen. Blum wasn't doing spin. He was outright lying. A National Guardsman in Iraq has 10 times the likelihood of dying in combat as did one during Vietnam. Why would anyone enlist for a liar?" (AllSpinZone)

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.