Statistics Happen

On the heels of a survey conducted by the University of Michigan, the media has sent mixed or incorrect messages to the public about teen use of cigarettes, alcohol, and other drugs. While long-term trends in increases or decreases in smoking and drug use can be measured with this survey, many changes from 2003 to 2004 were not statistically significant.

Despite this, the findings were reported – if not trumpeted – by the media as if they had great meaning. Worse yet, by emphasizing which drugs are being used by current drug users – and neglecting the larger context – the public is misled about drug abuse by teens.

USA Today, for example, headlined its report with "Survey: More teens using Oxycontin."

Sure, the percentages of 12th-graders reporting having used Oxycontin went from 4 percent in 2002 to 4.5 percent in 2003, and now to 5 percent in 2004. The 1 percent increase from 2002 to 2004 is statistically significant. However, highlighting this small-yet-noteworthy increase in Oxycontin use over this two-year period (an increase that was not noted in 8th or 10th grades) eclipses the brighter picture of drug use among teens: Since 2002, the use of illicit drugs in the last year has declined by 2.2 percent among 12th graders.

The increase in Oxycontin use may be more accurately described as a gain in popularity among drug users. In the same time period, the use of LSD any time over the past year went down 1.3 percent, and the use of ecstasy went down 3.4 percent among 12th graders. Perhaps those who have used Oxycontin this year would have used LSD two years ago; these shifts in drug popularity are not indicative of more teens becoming addicted to, or even trying, illicit drugs.

Another source for confusion were the reports on smoking. The Associated Press heralded "progress" in preventing teen smoking by leading with "Federal study finds modest drop in teen drug use, smoking in 2004." Indeed, smoking has been reduced significantly since the early 90s, but the changes from 2003 to 2004 are almost entirely insignificant. The survey asked students four relevant questions about smoking:


  • had they ever smoked;

  • had they smoked in the past thirty days;

  • had they smoked in the past day, and;

  • had they smoked more than half a pack in the past day.


The change in percentage (from 2003 to 2004) among students answering all four of these questions was statistically insignificant for 8th and 12th graders. Among 10th graders, the changes in percentages were statistically insignificant for two of the questions. Only the decline in ever having smoked among 10th graders (from 43 percent to 40.7 percent) and the decline in those 10th graders smoking half a pack or more a day (from 4.1 percent to 3.3 percent) were statistically significant, hardly justifying the AP claim that "This was the eighth consecutive year that smoking rates among surveyed teens dropped."

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.