alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Ask Well, Know Much

I know teachers are fond of telling students "there's no such thing as a stupid question," which is a good thing because as Neil Postman has pointed out, most kids enter school as question marks and come out as periods.

So I'm all for the no-stupid-question rule within the classroom. But as with so many important things, we sometimes forget to remind young people before they graduate that there are always exceptions to the rule.

Example: In the late 1980s, right after I stupidly became a high school dropout, I worked as a supermarket deli clerk. (I subsequently recovered from my educational rebellion and at least got my G.E.D – an exam, by the way, I think I would have passed with flying colors when I was a freshman, but that's another column).

For several years before that, the store had an ice machine right next to the deli counter – a popular spot for summer shoppers. But then one day, management moved the ice-making machine to the other side of the store.

Not long after that, this friendly woman approached the deli counter and asked: "Do you still sell ice?" So I say: "Yes 'we' do. It's on the other side of the store now." Then she says: "Oh. Is it frozen?"

So, I decided years ago that an African proverb would be my guiding (writing) light. "To ask well is to know much." Asking good questions is often more important, and insightful, than having the "right" answers, precisely because good questions can open up your mind to explore uncharted territory, which brings me to my second point.

Not all opinions are created equal. Yes, yes. We should all respect each other's opinion, but unless my most dearly held opinions have been subjected to the purging fires of the best and most articulate opposing arguments, my opinion is about as interesting as pop-up ads on the Internet.

That's why one of my favorite quips is from the philosopher J.S. Mill, who once said "he who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that." And that doesn't mean finding some opinionated fool who happens to be parroting watered-down arguments of opinion-makers and then attacking his or her argument for the nonsense that it is.

So on to a few questions, and I'll let you decide if they're stupid or not.

Why don't critics of Michael Moore's new flick express the same thorough skepticism with the Bush administration?

One Moore hater told me that one reason he disliked the movie is because it was too conspiratorial and implied shady dealings between the Bush administration and the Saudis without having any "smoking gun" evidence that the private meetings between the two parties weren't innocuous.

OK. Well, why not bring that same skepticism to the Bush administration claim that bin Laden and Saddam were in cahoots because of meetings between al-Qaida members and security officials in Saddam's regime? (Need I mention Iraq's WMDs?)

What's more important – that a moviemaker gets it exactly right or that the President of the United States gets it exactly right?

How many times are fundamentalists going to use the this-country-was-founded-on-Christianity polemic? Never mind the genocide committed on Native Americans or the enslavement of blacks, do they realize that the religious views of America's founders were much more complex than the Apostle's Creed? Thomas Jefferson considered the Bible to be full of untruths, except for certain "authentic sayings" of Jesus.

He took scissors to the Bible to make his own version, looking forward to the day when Jesus being considered "the Supreme Being... in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of... Minerva in the brain of Jupiter."

So how come conservative Christians aren't insisting that Jefferson is burning in Hades, quoting verses from Paul's letters about what hellish future awaits those who mess with the Word?

Why are Fox News conservatives convinced that because "most" news reporters allegedly vote Democrat, it's ironclad proof that the corporate media is controlled by "liberals"? What about editors and publishers? They're the ones who ultimately decide what gets covered and what doesn't. Don't they realize that blaming reporters for biased coverage is a bit like yelling at a restaurant server for a bad meal? Hey buddy, calm down. I didn't cook it, I just brought it to your table.

And how long will I be able to write columns like this before "freedom-loving conservatives" are successful at putting a muzzle on my big fat mouth?

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close