Cold Mountain Cold Shoulders Painful Racial Truths

How do you get away with opening a Civil War tale with one of the war's bloodiest battles in which black troops played a pivotal role but ignore them, set much of the film's action in the slave states of Virginia and North Carolina, yet show only the briefest glimpse of black slaves laboring in the fields, and have white Southern belles mouthing anti-slavery platitudes? Cold Mountain film director Anthony Minghella did, by tagging the word "fiction" after "historical" and deftly ducking and dodging the painful issues of slavery and race. Minghella is hardly the first filmmaker to blink when it comes to tackling these issues. They are still America's greatest and most enduring bugaboos. But there's a troubling problem in his skirting of these issues. Minghella spent much time and effort in trying to make the film as historically credible as possible.

He hired Civil War military consultants, a period historical painter and collector, and consulted with historians to insure accuracy. The Union and Confederate soldier's uniforms, insignias, and battle flags were exact. The marching formations were precise. The Confederate trenches and fortifications were near perfect replicas. And the battlefield was meticulously recreated. Then there's the gut wrenching, and prolonged, opening battle scene. This is where the filmmakers dumped historical accuracy and reverted to fiction. It was fought in July 1864 near Petersburg, Virginia. The bloody and senseless battle was characterized by monumental bungling by Union commanders. Black and white Union soldiers were slaughtered during the attack. In the ensuing carnage, the Confederate soldiers summarily executed many of the black troops even as they tried to surrender.

The bloodletting and the heroic sacrifice of the black troops were totally missing in the film. Were the filmmakers worried that the raw, and brutal depiction of the racial savagery inflicted on the black troops would have shocked an audience's senses? Or worse, that showing the barbarism would have been too racially inflammatory? They're false fears. The countless films and documentaries that have filled the big and little screen on the Holocaust have not incited riots or fueled anti-Semitic violence. A historically accurate depiction of the grim and gory aspects of Nazi genocidal violence has broadened the public's understanding of the danger of anti-Semitism, and the need for continuing vigilance in the struggle against racism and anti-Semitism.

If Cold Mountain had truthfully depicted the heroism, tragedy, and sacrifice of the black soldiers in the battle, this would have done much to destroy the twin myth that black soldiers played only a peripheral role in the Civil War, and that whites alone fought and died to end slavery. Nearly 200,000 blacks enlisted to fight in the Union army. The black divisions that fought in the Petersburg battle suffered the greatest number of casualties that black troops suffered in any of the Civil War battles. Cold Mountain's historic blind spot to black battlefield valor is even more inexplicable considering the wide acclaim of the 1987 film, Glory. This depicted the heroism and the struggles of an all-black regiment during the Civil War. In addition, there have been a number of docudramas and PBS specials detailing the exploits of black troops, or that have included them in various Civil War battle scenes. There are also legions of scholarly works, and articles on the pivotal role that blacks played in the Union victory.

Perhaps the most galling thing about Cold Mountain's whitewash of an important historical fact is that the film could have accurately shown black troops fighting and dying without sacrificing the film's romantic and Homeric Odyssey story line. Cold Mountain's high profile, and highly bankable stars, Nicole Kidman, Jude Law, and Renee Zellweger would have still got their props, audiences would still have crowded the theaters to see the film, critics would have still piled mountains of praise on it, and it would still have gotten its eight Golden globe nominations, and almost certain strong Academy Award consideration.

Still, despite Cold Mountain's racial fumble, the film could rekindle mild public interest in learning what really happened on the killing fields at Petersburg on that grim July day. The day after the film opened officials at the Petersburg National battlefield announced that they would offer walking tours of the key parts of the battlefield where the main fighting took place.

The tours won't play to the huge theater going multitudes that will see Cold Mountain. But they could help tell at least some of the painful racial truths that Cold Mountain cold-shouldered.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst.

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ }}
@2022 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by