Locked Away to Die

Charlene Marquez, 39, had a drug problem. It eventually killed her. But unlike junkies who overdose in their homes, are killed in drug-related violence or die of hypothermia on the streets, Marquez died in prison.

She was found dead in her cell early in the morning of Sept. 1, 2002, two days after her 39th birthday. An autopsy revealed bits of rubber and plastic in her stomach, the remains of a balloon that had been filled with heroin.

Her death highlights two serious problems, critics say.

The first is the ease with which illegal drugs are smuggled into prison. It's a problem common to prisons across the country, one corrections personnel nationwide struggle to resolve.

But the second has a more local flavor: Colorado's failure to fund drug-treatment programs adequately inside and outside the prison system. And it's a problem that is about to grow worse, as the state legislature makes significant budget cuts in human-services programs in light of the state's economic woes.

Body of evidence

One of the down sides to death is that you leave your body behind, undefended.

Charlene's body was found in her cell at Denver Women's Correctional Facility at 6:20 a.m. on Sept. 1. It was photographed, fingerprinted, placed in a white body bag closed with a locking plastic seal labeled with the number 0209.

Because Charlene died under suspicious circumstances, her body was quickly given an autopsy.

The medical examiner measured the length of her long, brown hair: 40 cm. He examined her genitals and reproductive organs, which were found to be normal with the exception of a tubal ligation done to prevent pregnancy. He removed and weighed her brain, heart, lungs, liver, and kidneys. He catalogued the contents of her stomach and measured the depth of her subcutaneous abdominal fat.

He noted other things, as well, details of a life now over. Charlene had blue flowers tattooed on her right thigh. The name "Andy" was tattooed on the back of her left wrist. There was a large surgery scar on her abdomen. She was missing several teeth. Her ears were pierced.

It was in her blood that the examiner found what he was looking for. Toxicology tests revealed a high level of morphine in Charlene's blood and a small amount of codeine in her bladder. Based on test results, as well as the bits of rubber found in her stomach, the coroner drew a picture for investigators that looks something like this:

Late on Aug. 31 or early on Sept. 1, Charlene swallowed a balloon of heroin. A short time later, the balloon ruptured, flooding Charlene's system with an overdose of heroin. She died quickly. The body breaks heroin down into morphine, then codeine. Because her blood levels of morphine were so high and relatively little codeine was found, she died before her body could metabolize much of the drug.

"This doesn't look like injection, but rather ingestion," says Dr. Thomas Henry, who performed the autopsy.

Exactly how Marquez obtained the drug remains uncertain. An internal investigation continues in the Department of Corrections. Preliminary information from that investigation is unavailable to the public at this time for security reasons.

However, a DOC spokeswoman said Charlene had not left the prison, nor had she received visitors on Aug. 31.

Those facts combined indicate Charlene obtained the drug from a source within the prison.

Drug economy

Pilot K. Hawkeye Gross used to smuggle drugs into the United States. He made a lot of money doing it. It finally caught up with the Boulder resident in 1978, however, when he was arrested with 1,130 pounds of marijuana. He spent two years in Florida prisons and has since authored three books on his experiences, including Drug Smuggling: The Forbidden Book, a how-to guide for people interested in this dangerous but lucrative career (Paladin Press).

Gross says contraband, particularly cigarettes but also illegal drugs, form the backbone of the in-prison economy.

"The possibility is much greater of getting contraband into (state prisons) than at the county level," Gross says.

Prisoners are often taken into the community for work during the day and can pre-arrange for friends or relatives to drop off banned goods or drugs in those locations. Gross recalls a lifer who routinely smuggled Smirnoff vodka into prison using that technique.

"If you can get a bottle of Smirnoff in, you can get anything in," Gross says.

But the primary source of drugs for prisoners in the Florida state system were prison guards.

"It was a big source of income for them," Gross says. "The guards -- that was their concession."

Most of the guards came from poorly educated, lower-income backgrounds?not unlike the socioeconomic backgrounds of the prisoners?and were able to vastly increase their incomes by selling drugs to prisoners.

The most common form of contraband was cigarettes, but marijuana was a popular second, often sold as tiny $1 "pin joints," Gross says.

He himself traded cigarettes for fresh tomatoes and for a daily change of clean sheets. While he never saw anyone using heroin in prison, he knew inmates who used cocaine.

Gross has mixed feelings about the war on drugs. On the one hand, it presents an opportunity.

"I just love knowing that with my skills and experience, if I decide to saddle up again, there's a million-dollar payday waiting for me," he says.

On the other hand, it's an enormous waste of money. About $50 billion in taxpayer money could be saved if the war on drugs ended. If marijuana were legalized and taxed like tea, Gross estimates another $50 billion would be generated. The combined $100 billion would be enough to provide free health care for every American, he says.

Most of all, the war on drugs is pointless, he says. Decades of increased law enforcement have shown that prohibition does not stop the demand for drugs nor their illegal importation, yet the effort continues.

"I absolutely guarantee you, I could smuggle in a load of marijuana if I wanted to," he says. "If there's something you can't stop, what's the point?"

Dope behind bars

"We work our hardest to keep contraband out," says Allison Morgan, spokeswoman for the Department of Corrections. Still, some drugs make it inside through a variety of means.

Work crews made up of prisoners who leave the facility are one source, she says. But correctional officers also play a role.

"Staff bring it in," she says. "I'm not going to run away from that. We work very hard to prevent that."

Sometimes a staff member will sell drugs for economic reasons, perhaps due to a personal financial crisis, she says.

Correctional officers in Colorado start at a salary of about $31,000.

At other times, a staff person might find themselves being manipulated by a prisoner who offers rewards or makes threats in order to obtain certain contraband. DOC provides intensive training?160 hours of training followed by year of on-the-job training?to help prepare officers for situations they might encounter and to prevent guards from being compromised by inmates, she says.

DOC runs background checks on all its staff, and potential employees are required to pass a urine test before being hired. Further, random urine tests are performed throughout the year. But a urine test won't catch an officer who sells but doesn't use.

"If they don't use it, they're going to come up clean. So hopefully through intelligence, we'll learn about that," she says.

Each year, 50 percent of Colorado's more than 18,000 prisoners are randomly tested for drug use through urinalysis. About 3 percent of the population tests positive, a figure which is "very low," she says. If testing reveals clusters of positive results, officials launch an investigation, which can include searches, more urine testing and surveillance. Oftentimes, inmates themselves will step forward with information, and their identities are protected. Colorado DOC does not make use of undercover officers, she says.

In addition, DOC records all inmate phone calls, except those to attorneys, which are protected by law. Inmates are warned when they enter prison that their conversations will be monitored.

"It's still amazing what they say in those conversations," Morgan says.

But the biggest risk to security in Colorado's prisons are visitors, she says. Last year, the East Canyon City complex received more than 55,000 visitors. While maximum security inmates are not allowed contact visits with friends and family, other inmates are allowed to be in the same room with their visitors. They are strip searched afterwards, but some manage to conceal contraband inside their bodies, either swallowing them or inserting them in a body cavity. Body-cavity searches require a search warrant and probable cause and are therefore not performed routinely.

If urine tests show clusters of positive results in certain units, authorities might run a drug interdiction, searching the cars and personal possessions of visitors and making ion scans of their clothes and hands.

"We recently had a grandma who was bringing it in," Morgan says.

Supply and demand

While corrections officials and law enforcement work to contain the supply of drugs, prisoner-rights advocates and drug-treatment practitioners say the state would do well to look equally at the demand.

Colorado ranks dead last in state dollars spent in drug treatment. (The state is officially listed as 49th because Georgia state officials neglected to turn data in on time. However, had Georgia turned information in on time, Colorado would rank 50th.)

Research shows that for every $100 Colorado spends on the consequences of drug and alcohol abuse, only 6 cents are spent on treatment programs, says Janet Wood, director of the Alcohol and Drug Abuse division of the Colorado Department of Human Services.

That investment is about to drop as state budget problem, exacerbated by a sluggish economy, have resulted in budget cuts in drug-treatment programs, both in the prison system and outside. The DOC is expected to lose almost $270,000 of its $6.3 million drug and alcohol treatment budget. Additional funds will be cut from parole and community corrections programs that provide essential follow-up treatment to help addicted inmates adjust to living outside an institution.

In Colorado, all inmates entering state prisons are evaluated for physical, mental health and drug and alcohol problems. Those needing no drug or alcohol intervention are designated as Treatment Level 1. Those with extreme needs are classified as Level 6.

About 75 percent of all DOC inmates have some level of drug or alcohol problem, Morgan says.

But not all of those inmates have their needs met. A report published in December 2001, shows significant gaps between treatment needs of DOC inmates and available treatment services, particularly for levels 3, 4 and 6. (Level 5 treatment is not available within the system.)

For female inmates, no Level 2 treatment is available. About 37 percent of female inmates in need of Level 4 treatment don't receive it, while a staggering 64 percent of women in need of the highest level of intervention don't receive needed services.

At Denver Women's Correctional Facility, where Charlene was incarcerated, there is a rare Level 6 program?a therapeutic community?as well as two Alcoholics Anonymous groups. There are no level 2, 3 or 4 programs available at the facility.

However, state law prevents DOC officials from revealing whether Charlene was receiving assistance through either program. Her needs, like those of other female inmates, may have been more acute than those of the average male inmate. Research shows that most women in prison are victims of substantial physical and/or sexual abuse and have deep-seated emotional needs, Morgan says. DOC research shows that women who do have drug and alcohol problems typically need higher levels of treatment than male prisoners.

"That was one of the reasons we built Denver Women's," Morgan says. "I wish we could have a therapeutic community in every prison, but it's not financially realistic, so we try to prioritize."

The impact of prison

But some say prison is not conducive to recovery from addiction and that institutional drug-treatment programs face significant obstacles to success.

"Prison is not a therapeutic environment," says Christie Donner, co-coordinator of the Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition, a project of the Rocky Mountain Peace and Justice Center.

The coalition works with current and former inmates on a host of issues ranging from parenting while in prison to navigating the prison system to parole problems. The coalition also works to promote legislation that would reduce drug sentences and increase access to effective drug-treatment programs. Last year, the organization played a crucial role in the passage of the asset forfeiture bill, which requires a person be convicted of a crime before law enforcement can seize property or other assets.

Donner says less than half of prisoners who need help with drug and alcohol problems receive it. Most receive it shortly before their release date, after they've already become hardened from exposure to prison culture.

"People get warehoused for years, and when they get close to being released is when they're eligible for treatment," Donner says. "This notion that everyone who needs treatment gets it is not the truth. It's a very small percentage that are actually offered treatment."

Those who receive treatment often have a difficult time trusting therapists and prison staff, as their conversations are not confidential.

"People are afraid whatever they say can and will be used against them in a court of law, and it can be," Donner says. "It's not a safe environment, and I think that's a prerequisite for effective treatment."

Further, prison tends to have an impact on inmates' emotional well-being, giving them a tendency to shut down rather than open up. Even if they try to address their problems behind bars, the controlled prison environment is a sharp contrast to the world they meet when they're released.

"It's not a real-world environment," Donner says. "If we assumed prisons were a drug-free environment?which they obviously are not with the death of Ms. Marquez?forced abstinence is not the same thing as recovery."

Inmates must learn to cope with the challenges of life without drugs or alcohol. But that's much easier said than done. The world people leave behind when they're sentenced is often not the world they meet when they're released. About 90 percent of married inmates face divorce, many the loss of their children. If they have a felony record, they'll find it very difficult to find work or housing. In addition, housing and educational loans available to others are not available to them, putting limitations on opportunities to improve themselves and their financial well-being.

"Unless people can access treatment on the outside as part of their recovery, their likelihood of succeeding is very small," Donner says. "I think we as a society don't appreciate the impact prison has on people."

Wood says prison treatment can be effective?under certain circumstances.

"There has been research on institutional treatment programs, but what the research shows is it has to be followed by aftercare in the community," Wood says.

Inmates who receive aftercare have a decent chance of repairing their lives, but those receiving treatment in prison and no aftercare exhibit the same kinds of behaviors and problems within 18 months of their release as those who received no treatment, she says.

"The reality is, in working with people who are trying to reintegrate, unless you have family or a support system, you're not going to make it," Donner says.

Society's failures

Charlene was incarcerated on a four-year sentence in May 2000. She was released into community corrections?a halfway house?by September. A year later, she was allowed to live on her own under intense supervision.

But on March 13, 2002, she was returned to prison for a disciplinary infraction, Morgan says.

Within six months, she was dead.

Did the Colorado correctional system fail Charlene Marquez?

"She's dead," Donner says. "How much more of a failure can there be? Part of the responsibility is hers, but part of the responsibility is ours. I wouldn't put all the responsibility on her shoulders because we could be doing things that are proven more effective."

The key to treating drug and alcohol problems effectively is to acknowledge them as medical and mental health problems, she says. Colorado places too much emphasis on punishment and the criminal aspect of addiction and far too little on effective treatment.

The funding situation is so bad in Colorado with regard to both drug treatment and mental health treatment that it should be considered a crisis, Donner says.

"The stick is bigger than the carrot," she says. "People with substance abuse problems are risking death. If that's not a deterrent, prison won't be."

Not only can drug addiction itself land a person in prison, but the normal recovery process, which includes relapses, is a criminal offense. People trying to work their way free of addiction find themselves in and out of prison and develop a sense of failure, Donner says.

"The criminal justice system just looks at what this person did on this day, and if they're guilty, they punish them," she says. "There are so many gaps in the social infrastructure."

Last year's legislative attempt to reduce some drug sentences and put that money toward treatment passed both houses of the state legislature but was vetoed by Governor Bill Owens, who has repeatedly voiced his opposition to shortening drug sentences?and his mistrust of drug-treatment programs.

"You lock people up in a cage in Canyon City and say the problem is solved," she says. "But it's not. The prison system becomes the dumping ground for all the areas where society is failing."

Where does Charlene fall into the picture?

"The bottom line is she's dead. She's just another victim of the drug war," Donner says. "The question that comes to mind is, 'Would Ms. Marquez be dead if she'd been in an inpatient treatment center instead of prison?'"

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.