Why Michael Chabon Won't be Seeing Spider-Man

Michael Chabon is a major superhero fan. In his Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, Chabon (best-selling author of Wonder Boys and The Mysteries of Pittsburgh), chronicles the rise of the super-hero comic book, sanctifying it as a "great, mad new American art form." He's written drafts of comic book-to-movie adaptations (including one for X-Men), and in interviews, he talks of his boyhood fondness for classic superheroes, especially those with identifiably human traits -- like Spider-Man, a personal favorite. It's a fondness he's passed on to his own son, 5-year-old Zeke, now a major Spider-Man fan himself.

So why has Michael Chabon decided not to see the new Spider-Man movie? The answer is simple: It's rated PG-13.

That rating -- with its implications of violence, sexuality, language and cinematic intensity -- means that he won't take Zeke to see the film, just as he kept his 7-year-old daughter Sophie from seeing Lord of the Rings. This time, in solidarity and as a personal protest, Chabon is staying home as well. He admits that in the case of Rings, the rating was appropriate, and was consistent with Tolkien's violent, head-lopping source material.

"The ringwraiths and balrogs and orcs and so forth really do need to be horrible and terrifying," he allows. So Chabon doesn't begrudge the PG-13 rating -- for Lord of the Rings. "Spider-Man," he says, "is a different thing."

Chabon cites the "powerful iconic pull on the five year old male imagination," that Spider-Man holds. "His mere image in an ad on the side of a bus," says Chabon, "is enough to elicit a whoop of joy from Zeke and a cry of 'Dad! Dad! Spider-Man!.' Just that arrangement of red and blue and black produces a momentary blip of delight. And right now that image is everywhere. Zeke's world is saturated in it. And yet the thing itself is forbidden to him... It's just so cruel. It's like the world has given him the wrapping paper, the ribbon, the bow and the box, but not the present itself."

The important thing, he says, is that Spider-Man doesn't have to be grim, violent, or scary.

"I mean, it can be," he admits. "That's justified by the increasingly dark tone taken by comic books, Spider-Man among them, over the past 15 years or so. I understand perfectly well why the filmmakers went in this direction. They don't want 5-year-olds. They want 15-year-olds. That's fine. It makes economic sense. I get it. The filmmakers can abandon and break the hearts of the 5-year-olds of America."

"But," he adds, "Spider-Man never would."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.