Pigs Don't Know Pigs Stink

Country people don't mind smelly hogs. Thus, folks who complain about fierce odors from big corporate hog farms must be fastidious city people. That is what the agribusiness corporations would have us believe!

Corporate agribusinesses come into rural areas, set up huge concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), then brand anyone who dares oppose these facilities as "move ins" -- fussy city people who just can't adapt to the smells of the countryside.

And that is the "Big Lie," to which you can add: "Tell a lie often enough, and it becomes the truth." This spin doctoring of hog odor has been repeated so often that even those who spin it now seem to believe it.

But not so a judge in rural Dekalb County, Alabama. That state may not be known as a bastion of progressivism, but then there's nothing progressive about digging a big hole in the ground and filling it full of hog crap.

Hence, the Alabama judge saw through the claims of the corporation -- in this case, Gold Kist, Inc. -- and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a nuisance suit. (The citation is Circuit Court of Dekalb County, Alabama, Case # CV-1999-345R, order entered January 9, 2002, Ivey v. Gold Kist, Inc.).

The facts were relatively simple. Gold Kist, Inc. had entered into a contract with two hog producers, Jeffrey and Marty Wooten. As with most such contracts, Gold Kist owned the hogs, the Wootens owned the land and buildings, and the contract prescribed the day-to-day management practices of the producers. The Wootens constructed buildings that housed 8,000 hogs. The hogs stank. The neighbors objected, and filed a nuisance suit.

The language of the judge in his findings in favor of the plaintiffs bears repeating:

Quote: "The respective Plaintiffs have lived in the area for various periods of time; however, all of them were residing on or around the loop road before the Defendants constructed their CAFOs. Most of them have lived there for many years.

Still Quoting: "In determining whether the odor in question constitutes a nuisance, this court is required to consider whether the Plaintiffs are reasonable in their complaints. To constitute a nuisance, the inconvenience the Plaintiffs complain of must not be fanciful, or such as would only effect one of fastidious taste. A person of fastidious taste is a person who is difficult to please, rejects what is common, and is very critical or is easily disgusted. The Plaintiffs do not individually or collectively meet this profile of a fastidious person.

"The Plaintiffs are not hypersensitive city dwellers complaining of a minor annoyance. They are a group of hardy, hard working, self sufficient, independent, reasonable, and fair minded men and women who expect to be treated just as they would treat others."

Thus a county judge in Alabama skewers the claims of the agribusiness corporations. These are no normal smells of the country! The odors from BigPig are offensive to longtime rural residents.

Of course, the agribusiness corporations also make the oft-repeated statement that "It smells like money." To which the appropriate reply is "So money smells like hog manure?"

ACLU By ACLUSponsored

Imagine you've forgotten once again the difference between a gorilla and a chimpanzee, so you do a quick Google image search of “gorilla." But instead of finding images of adorable animals, photos of a Black couple pop up.

Is this just a glitch in the algorithm? Or, is Google an ad company, not an information company, that's replicating the discrimination of the world it operates in? How can this discrimination be addressed and who is accountable for it?

“These platforms are encoded with racism," says UCLA professor and best-selling author of Algorithms of Oppression, Dr. Safiya Noble. “The logic is racist and sexist because it would allow for these kinds of false, misleading, kinds of results to come to the fore…There are unfortunately thousands of examples now of harm that comes from algorithmic discrimination."

On At Liberty this week, Dr. Noble joined us to discuss what she calls “algorithmic oppression," and what needs to be done to end this kind of bias and dismantle systemic racism in software, predictive analytics, search platforms, surveillance systems, and other technologies.

What you can do:
Take the pledge: Systemic Equality Agenda
Sign up