DURST: Boobies on TV!

According to the Supreme Court's response to a challenge by Playboy, Congress went too far and violated our free speech rights when it required cable TV systems to restrict sex oriented networks to overnight hours if they don't fully scramble their signal for nonsubscribers.

Which means: Boobies! On TV. All the time. Anytime. Of any day. Boobies for breakfast. Boobies for lunch. Boobies for afternoon tea. And no, I'm not talking about the Jerry Springer show or C-SPAN's coverage of the House Appropriations Committee.

You know what, it's not really going to change anything. There's already enough boobies on the tube on an hourly basis to equip your everyday normal Wisconsin heifer maternity farm. Hell, in some East African countries, schoolboys learn about puberty by viewing "Baywatch."

Besides, isn't this is a little like opening up the barn door after the cows have formed a union and gone on a research sabbatical to the Easter Islands? After midnight, the premium channels are nothing more than Soft-Porn-O-Thons featuring filtered versions of the Silicone Olympics anyway.

Unlike obscene material, the court ruled that mere indecent material is constitutionally protected. Which means I'm free to continue my stand up career. Yea! Indecent material. Way to go.

Justice Kennedy said "basic speech principles are at stake in this case." And you know what, he's right. Although I have no idea what that means, anytime Hugh Hefner wins in the Supreme Court has to be considered a good day.

In a related case, the Justices also ruled any program featuring Pamela Anderson Lee should be entitled "Booby Trap."

Will Durst wonders what the damn deal with mammary glands is anyway.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.