HIGHTOWER: Stock Wealth

Some days I think that rather than reading the newspaper, it'd be a lot less frustrating to just whap myself upside the head with it.This New York Times article is a good example. It's the lead story on the front page, and it has a Happy-News headline that blares: "Share of Wealth In Stock Holdings Hits 50-Year High." The gist of it is that the booming stock market is now the major source of wealth for American households, outstripping the value of homes as our greatest asset. The Times asserts that stock holdings make up more than a fourth of household wealth today.This story is not based on some official report, but on the newspaper's own analysis of wealth data. In other words, the story is manufactured by the Times, and the paper makes it appear to be very good news indeed: "Americans are feeling richer as the value of their stock holdings rise," the story gushes, adding that "where skyrocketing real estate prices once provided reassurance to the middle class, soaring stock portfolios now do."That's dandy ... except that it's wrong.Very few middle-classers own any stock to speak of, much less enough to reassure them. In fact, 67 percent of us Americans own no stock at all -- not through mutual funds, 401Ks, pension plans or in any other way. This two-thirds of our population is as stockless as the Times is clueless.The newspaper's deceptive report, you see, is averaging our households. For example, you might have zero in stock holdings, whereas some tycoon is sitting on a billion dollars worth. On average then, you and that tycoon each have half-a-billion in stock, statistically speaking, of course.This is Jim Hightower saying ... Yes, household stock-wealth is up dramatically ... but, the key question is, in whose households? Here's a final statistic to shed some light on the subject: 89 percent of all stock is owned by the richest 10 percent of Americans.Source:"Share of Wealth in stock holdings hits 50-year high" by Edward Wyatt. New York Times: Feb. 11, 1998.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.