HIGHTOWER: Don't Let the B-2 Get Wet

Would you buy a suit that you can't wear in the rain? Or a car that you have to keep in the garage when the weather gets warm? How about a house that deteriorates if exposed to even moderate humidity?You'd have to be a fool to buy these flawed products. So ... why are you buying the B-2 Stealth Bomber?Believe it or not, the General Accounting Office reports that this boondoggle of a bomber, this prodigious piece of Pentagon pork, can't go out in the rain! Also, the thing can't be exposed to heat or humidity! It turns out that even a little dab of nature destroys the thermoplastic "skin" of the plane, which is what makes it "stealthy," capable of not showing-up on enemy radar.I would laugh, but it costs too much. In 1981, the Pentagon said that it's contractor, Northrop Grumman, would build 132 B-2s for $22 billion. A decade (and 22 billion bucks) later, one plane had been built. One! And it failed its flight tests. The cost of this plane is roughly equal to three times its weight in gold.Meanwhile, the Soviet Union collapsed, which was the target the B-2 was designed to bomb, so the need for the bomber literally disappeared. Nonetheless, congress promptly handed another $44 billion to Northrop Grumman to build 21 more B-2s. Now we know what "B-2" stands for: Two Billion dollars apiece!These are the 21 stealth planes the GAO now reports are too fragile to tolerate precipitation, heat or humidity. Since there are no climate-controlled facilities abroad for the weather-sensitive bomber, it can't be stationed overseas.This is Jim Hightower saying ... So the military now is sheltering 21 stealth bombers at a cost of $2 billion a pop that have no enemy to bomb, that couldn't reach the enemy if there was one and that can't be allowed to get wet. Did I mention that Congress wants to build nine more of these dodo birds?Source:"$2 billion bomber can't stand the rain" by Tim Weiner. New York Times: August 23, 1997.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.