HIGHTOWER: Corporate Clergy

The race is on to see which company can fire the most workers the quickest!Just since Labor Day, Whirlpool dumped 4,700 people, Levi Strauss offed 6,400 individuals, Citicorp whacked 9,000 employees, Kodak cut 10,000 and General Motors took the lead by axing 42,000 folks. Wall Street analysts say this is just the start of something big, that we should expect another surge of major downsizings in the next few months.Of course, these "analysts" also serve as apologists for this corporate slaughter, rationalizing that each one of the job cuts is crucial to "efficiency" and "global competitiveness." Globaloney! GM, for example, is sitting on $15 Billion in cash reserves and has hauled-in $4.5 Billion in profits in just the last nine months. The employees of GM were key to amassing this pile of cash, but the top execs reward their productivity by drop-kicking 42,000 of them through the goalposts of global greed.Not that the CEOs are totally insensitive. They claim to "feel your pain," and to help assuage the anxiety, stress and morale problems caused by their mass firings, more and more corporations are offering "help." Not money, not assurances of job security, but ... chaplains. Yes, they are bringing chaplains into the workplace to provide counseling and spiritual guidance.But wait, corporations even get their chaplains on the cheap! Instead of full-time padres, these ministers are temporary workers. The bosses are turning to hiring agencies like Ministers-R-Us, Priests-in-a-Pinch or Rabbis-on-the-Run to get low-cost clergy to tend the corporate flock.This is Jim Hightower saying ... Same old story: The bosses get the cash, the workers get ministers promising "There'll be pie in the sky when you die."Source:"New round of layoffs may be beginning" by Fred Bleakley. Wall Street Journal: Nov. 13, 1997. "Chaplains-for-hire provide services in workplaces" by Stephanie Armour. USA Today: Nov. 14, 1997.

ACLU By ACLUSponsored

Imagine you've forgotten once again the difference between a gorilla and a chimpanzee, so you do a quick Google image search of “gorilla." But instead of finding images of adorable animals, photos of a Black couple pop up.

Is this just a glitch in the algorithm? Or, is Google an ad company, not an information company, that's replicating the discrimination of the world it operates in? How can this discrimination be addressed and who is accountable for it?

“These platforms are encoded with racism," says UCLA professor and best-selling author of Algorithms of Oppression, Dr. Safiya Noble. “The logic is racist and sexist because it would allow for these kinds of false, misleading, kinds of results to come to the fore…There are unfortunately thousands of examples now of harm that comes from algorithmic discrimination."

On At Liberty this week, Dr. Noble joined us to discuss what she calls “algorithmic oppression," and what needs to be done to end this kind of bias and dismantle systemic racism in software, predictive analytics, search platforms, surveillance systems, and other technologies.

What you can do:
Take the pledge: Systemic Equality Agenda
Sign up