HIGHTOWER: Congressional Pork Weakens Defense

Every now and then Washington slips up, and a little bit of truth accidentally slips out of the carefully calibrated PR machine that's designed to keep the public ignorant about what's really going on.This happened just recently when the Joint Chiefs of Staff testified before a U.S. Senate committee. To the surprise of the military brass, several Republican Senators suddenly hit them with rapid-fire accusations that they had been downplaying problems of troop shortages and aging weapons, leading to a drop in the "combat readiness" of American troops.The New York Times reports that the five generals and admirals at the witness table were momentarily shellshocked by the barrage, but they quickly regrouped and returned fire -- and this is when a bit of truth popped out. The Chiefs said they could have been putting billions more into troops and weapons if only the Congress would let them close unnecessary military bases and stop making them buy planes, and ships, and other expensive hardware that they have not requested and don't need.The military took aim at one especially wasteful chunk of congressional pork -- the purchase of 20 C-130 transport planes. The Air Force didn't want these planes, but Congress insisted -- or, more accurately, two particular members of congress insisted. One was Newt Gingrich, the Loudspeaker of the House. The C-130s are built in Newt's home district, providing a nice government subsidy for his constituents ... and for his re-election. The other was Trent Lott, the Senate Majority Leader, who got government facilities and payroll for his state by requiring the Pentagon to base these transport planes in Mississippi. As an Air Force General pointedly told the Senators at the hearing, "Not only were the planes added [to our budget], but then we're told where to put them."This is Jim Hightower saying ... Republicans claim the Pentagon needs more money, but it already gets $271 billion a year. They ought to be able to pay for troops and weapons on that ... if Congress quits rolling out the pork barrel.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.