Gingrich Offline

House Speaker Newt Gingrich wasted no time in posting independent counsel Kenneth Starr's report on President Clinton to the Internet last Friday afternoon. Unfortunately, the Speaker has not been as forthcoming with the work of Congress as he has with these titillating tales of sex in the Oval Office.Gingrich has been promising to put congressional documents online ever since 1994. In his first major speech after that year's Republican rout, Gingrich promised to "change the rules of the House" to require that all documents be filed electronically "so that information is available to every citizen in the country at the same moment that it is available to the highest-paid Washington lobbyist."But Gingrich has not kept his promise. "Speaker Gingrich puts the Starr report on the Internet but keeps off the Internet the most important congressional documents," consumer activist Ralph Nader said.Working drafts of bills, for example, are routinely reviewed by lobbyists in private. But these so-called "chairman's marks" are not available to ordinary citizens, either on paper or online."It's easier to find stock market reports online than it is to see the text of a bill that would affect every American," rued Gary Ruskin, director of the nonprofit Congressional Accountability Project.Lobbyist disclosure reports are another example. These are the records that show who paid lobbyists, and how much. Congress keeps these records on a computer. But they are only released on paper, and only to individuals who request them in person at a back room in the Capitol. The situation is similar for Congress' own financial disclosure and office expenditure reports.Congressional Research Service reports and testimony given at public hearings is available online, but it isn't free. The only way to get these and many other public documents on the Internet is via expensive private services that cost thousands of dollars a year.And when Gingrich does post sensitive infomation about Congress online, he never does it as swiftly as he did with the Starr report. Last year, for example, the Speaker took several days to get his own story straight before he allowed the House Ethics Committee to post a report about Gingrich's misdeeds.Sidebar 1: There are a few free sources of limited congressional information:Library of Congress: http://thomas.loc.govGovernment Printing Office: http://www.access.gpo.govC-SPAN operates a "Congressional Vote Library": Center for Responsive Politics posts financial disclosure reports on its site: http://www.crp.orgFor more information about what Speaker Gingrich hasn't put online, check out the Congrressional Accountability Project site:***Sidebar 2:The Starr report is being made available through these government Webaddresses:


Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.