Free TV for Candidates

Bill Clinton announced last week that the corruption caused by private campaign financing can be solved by requiring broadcasters to provide free TV time to candidates. The President suggested that such a measure would help "free our democracy from the grip of big money."What he didn't add is that a grip, applied two ways, is called a handshake.Just hours after making the proposal, Clinton attended a $25,000-a-plate swordfish dinner in the Crystal Ballroom of the Carlton Hotel. In exchange for some grins with the guests and a couple of Kodak moments, Clinton raised over half a million dollars -- 90 percent of which would have been illegal under the man's own recommendations.Brazen? It gets better. As the speculators and land sharks savored their candied chestnut ice cream, Clinton actually rose up and speechified about the need for reform, saying that "there is much more to do." Besides look in the mirror, apparently.We're talking serious brass. I'm surprised the TV mics don't pick up the rhythmic clanking when the President jogs.Why the lip service? Needing to happyface the daily revelations about White House fundraising -- go to the side door, small bills only, ask for Lenny -- Clinton is cleverly trying to lower the heat by posing as a do-gooder, advocating a populist reform that he knows has zero chance of happening in the near-term.Make no mistake, the free TV proposal would help, and it's entirely doable, at least hypothetically. New legislation isn't even necessary; the FCC can mandate free time for political candidates whenever it wants. (The mythical "free market" doesn't apply here, since the broadcast industry wouldn't even exist without goverment-protected monopolies over individual frequencies.)Not that such a mandate is likely. You're asking for concerted altruism from a bunch of silk-suited politicians and TV execs. You might as well ask a humming swarm of locusts to play "Kum By Yah."See, the Democrats want to keep the White House in 2000, which means Al Gore is about to eat more seafood dinners that Moby Dick. As will Kemp, Gramm, and the other whales of the GOP.Once that first fifty million or so is burning a pocket hole, where do you think Al's gonna blow it? As you've probably realized, the ultimate recipient of much of the money spent in political campaigns is the media itself.Next election season, go visit a TV station and sit in the lobby for an hour or two. You'll see an amazingly constant stream of opposing campaign staffers buying time and dropping off their latest attack ads and rebuttals. As you'd imagine, the more panicky the one-upmanship gets, the calmer the station beancounters become. It's like watching a poker game where no matter who raises the bet, the casino gets to keep every chip.In turn, the media reinvests a big chunk of cash into candidates who favor proposals to make the Murdochs and Perelmans even richer. Clinton himself was financed last year in large part by Time-Warner, which, you'll notice, was the one media company Bob Dole consistently singled out for verbal abuse.You think Clinton and Gore are gonna turn their backs on that cash by pushing the FCC to mandate free ad time? Sure, and Chevy Chase is just in a creative lull.Predictably, the National Association of Broadcasters doesn't care for the idea of a) giving away what they can sell, and b) losing the inflence the ad money buys. So they're ready to start using their government-granted monopolies to synonymize private financing of TV ads, "free speech" (for those who can afford it), and the American flag until we're all half-convinced that Paul Revere brought coaxial cable to Concord and the Boston Tea Party was hosted by Jenny McCarthy.Free TV for candidates simply can't fly if the media won't give it air.Besides, there's only one real long-term solution -- a public campaign financing system. Getting it will require citizen activism of a Civil Rights scale.Which sounds like a big deal, but it's not asking much. We've no right to expect a healthy democracy until we behave like we actually have one.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.