World  
comments_image Comments

How Canada Became Subservient to Washington's Imperial Agenda

A new book explains that Canada's support for the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan is linked to aspirations of empire.
 
 
Share

Canadian and American flags fly at a ceremony in Afghanistan.
Photo Credit: Keith D. Henning/Wikimedia Commons

 
 
 
 

Americans tend to think of Canadians as politer and more sensible than their southern neighbors. That explains why the answer to the joke “Why does the Canadian chicken cross the road?” is “To get to the middle.”

Sure there might be a bit of a muddle over there in Afghanistan, an American might reason, but like the well-intentioned Dudley Do Right, the Canadians are just trying to develop and tidy up the place.

Not in the opinion of co-editors Jerome Klassen and Greg Albo, and the formidable array of academics, researchers, journalists, and peace activists whose essays appear in  Empire’s Ally: Canada and the War in Afghanistan. They see Canada’s role in Central Asia less as a series of policy blunders than as a coldly calculated strategy to benefit international capital. “Simply put,” writes Klassen, “the war in Afghanistan was always linked to the aspirations of empire on a much broader scale.”

Empire’s Ally asks the question, “Why did the Canadian government go to war in Afghanistan in 2001?” It then carefully dissects the popular rationales: fighting terrorism, coming to the aid of the United States, helping the Afghans to develop their country — and, oh yes, freeing women from oppression. The book’s autopsy of those arguments reveals deeply disturbing trends.

Calling Canada’s Afghan adventure a “revolution,” Klaussen argues that Ottawa’s foreign policy has gone from something that was at times independent from Washington’s to one that is outright subservient to the United States. “The new direction of Canadian foreign policy cannot be explained simply by policy mistakes, U.S. demands, military adventurism, security threats, or abstract notions of liberal idealism,” he says. “More accurately, it is best explained by structural tendencies in the Canadian political economy — in particular, by the internationalization of Canadian capital and the realignment of the state as a secondary power in the U.S.-led system of empire.”

In short, the war in Afghanistan is not about people failing to read Kipling, but rather is part of a worldwide economic and political offensive by the United States and its allies to dominate sources of energy and weaken any upstart competitors like China, and India. Nor is the “broader scale” limited to any particular region.

Indeed, the United States and its allies have transformed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) from a European alliance aimed at containing the Soviet Union, to an international military force with a global agenda. Afghanistan was the alliance’s coming out party, its first deployment outside of Europe. The new “goals” are, as one planner put it, to try to “re-establish the West at the centre of global security,” to guarantee access to cheap energy, to police the world’s sea lanes, to “project stability beyond its borders,” and even to concern itself with “Chinese military modernization.”

If this all sounds very 19th century, as if someone should strike up a chorus of “Britannia Rules the Waves,” the authors in this volume would agree. But they’d point out that global capital is now far more powerful and all embracing than the likes of Charles “Chinese” Gordon and Lord Herbert Kitchener ever envisioned. One of the book’s strong points is its updating of capitalism, so to speak, and its careful analysis of what has changed since the end of the Cold War.

Increasing Peril

Empire’s Ally’s four major parts deal with the history of Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan, its political and economic underpinnings, the actual Canadian experiences in Afghanistan, and Canada’s anti-war movement. Devastatingly, the authors find that Canada’s activities in Afghanistan had less to do with digging wells, educating people, and improving their health, than with condoning war crimes such as  torture. As  Canada’s Senate Standing Committee on National Security put it with regard to Kandahar, Ottawa’s major area of concentration in Afghanistan, “Life is clearly more perilous because we are there.”

 
See more stories tagged with: