Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Latin America Reflects on the Other 9/11

By Daniel Denvir, AlterNet. Posted September 11, 2008.


Can we create a world in which no one has to suffer through burning buildings or torture chambers?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

35 years ago on September 11th, 28 years before Al-Qaeda fighters crashed hijacked passenger planes into the World Trade Center's two towers, the Nixon Administration helped orchestrate a right wing military coup against democratically elected Chilean President Salvador Allende. As troops under the command of General Augusto Pinochet approached the presidential palace, Allende gave a farewell radio address to the nation and then shot himself in the head, refusing the military's offer of "safe passage."

Today in Chile, thousands across the country gathered, as they do every year, to remember that day.

A recent New York Times article discusses how many people in the Middle East believe that the U.S. government must have been behind the attacks on New York and Washington seven years ago. They don't believe that a guy hanging out in Afghanistan could get by the ostensibly foolproof security of the world's most powerful nation. While I think that it is certain that, for better or for worse, a group of Muslim fundamentalists carried out the attack, I also think that it worthwhile to consider about how 9/11 has turned into a contested symbol, a symbol that remains the point of departure for a long running political and military disaster.

The dominant image in the U.S., the one articulated by Bush and co-ideologues in the attack's aftermath, was that a great nation was attacked by horrible people who hated this great nation for everything that made it great. This sense of exceptionalism and ahistoricism, that our tragedy is qualitatively "unique," has buttressed eight years of cultural chauvinism and war that ranks as extreme even in the context of a rather checkered history of U.S. foreign policy.

The global propagation of this 9/11 image has caused some distress in Latin America and other parts of the world. In claiming that 9/11 was a unique tragedy, we belittle the tragedies of others. In claiming that 9/11 was a crime against an innocent nation, we render our support for brutal dictatorships in Latin America and other parts of the world invisible.

September elevenths took place on other dates throughout Latin America: Guatemala (June 27, 1954), Argentina (March 24, 1976) and the dirty wars in Guatemala, Nicaragua and El Salvador of the 1980s, to name some prominent examples.

In Chile, too, September 11th is a complicated symbol and an enduring political legacy. President Michelle Bachelet, whose father was tortured to death by the regime, today inaugurated a President Salvador Allende White Room in the presidential palace, La Moneda. The room, an exact replica from September 1973, will be a permanent reminder of what a small part of Chile looked like on the day democracy was overthrown.

But it will take more than a yearly ceremony to exorcise Chile's ghosts. The coup destroyed a dream of a democratic and socialist Chile. The "transition to democracy" that began 18 years ago was forged on the Right's conditions: a binomial electoral system that excludes the Left (akin to the U.S. two party system), a neoliberal economic system that favors private education, the privatization of natural resources, and so on.

According to Chilean professor Álvaro Cuadra, "September 11th has not ended in our country. It is present in every line of the constitution...In the Chile of today, there is peace neither for the dead nor for the living."

35 years later, the U.S. army occupies the countries of two toppled governments. Of course, neither the Taliban or Saddam's regime was progressive or democratic. Regardless, the pain and death inflicted is on some basic level the same, inflicted by a country with an unfortunate combination of limited geographical awareness and boundless military imagination.

Could September 11th instead be an opportunity to reflect upon the suffering and perseverance that unites us as humans? Putting aside the taunts such a suggestion would provoke from Bill O'Reilly and the like, wouldn't such a remembrance be a more human tribute to the dead, more human that having your name embroidered on an American Flag of Heroes?

We should not interpret overseas reminders of the existence of "other September elevenths" as insensitivity to the 2,974 people who died in the twin towers -- most of who were, unlike our government, innocent. Instead, we should take this opportunity to reflect on the need for a more just foreign policy and a world where no one has to suffer through burning buildings or torture chambers.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: 9/11, pinochet, chile, allende

Daniel Denvir (daniel.denvir [at]gmail.com) is an independent

journalist from the United States in Quito, Ecuador and a 2008

recipient of NACLA's Samuel Chavkin Investigative Journalism Grant.

He is the Editor-in-Chief at www.caterwaulquarterly.com and

reluctantly blogs at www.glocalcircus.blogspot.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Declassified documents regarding the US role in the Chile coup
Posted by: fanny666 on Sep 11, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the author,
Posted by: leTerrassier on Sep 11, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for speaking with honesty at a time when honesty is desperately needed in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

August 6th, 2001 is the day Bush turned a blind eye to terror
Posted by: Snowpuppy on Sep 11, 2008 9:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must remember that August 6th, 2001 was the day President Bush received the briefing from the CIA that clearly stated: Bin Laden Determined to Attack Within the US.

Bush was at his ranch in Crawford, TX on that day. Did he call the FAA, the Pentagon, the FBI, or major cities to raise general alertness?

No, he did not. Bush didn't raise any flags whatsoever.

Did President Bush cut his vacation short to address this potential threat with his cabinet members?

No, he did not. Bush remained on his ranch until the end of the month, after already taking more vacation time in his first year than most US presidents took in their entire terms.

August 6th should be remembered as the day that President Bush turned his back on America, and turned a blind eye to the threat of immanent terrorism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forces and Powers, the dynamics---
Posted by: bobtr900 on Sep 12, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with almost all of what the author said.

If Americans knew what our country has done in most Latin American countries they would be appalled. Many U.S. Administrations have been involved in such atrocities.

Interestingly enough these repressive and deadly administrations in the Latin Countries have had the Catholic Church, my religion, as their staunchest ally, not just U.S. Administrations alone. Whenever these Latin American Countries have tried to bring about reforms for the people they have had to fight the wealthy, the U.S. Government and the Catholic Church.

These kinds of things have occurred not only in Latin Countries but in Caribbean nations as well. Haiti is a perfect example of that. Anytime these nations have tried to do the right things and to make a better life for their citizens the aforementioned Powers have done everything possible to stop these humane efforts, despite the fact that the governments were democratically elected and quite popular with the people. The Aristide government in Haiti is the most recent example. The Morales government in Bolivia may be the next example. Watch for it to happen, once again.

For some reason or other when these nations have tried to break out of the cycle of poverty and disease they have been thwarted at every step by the aforementioned; the wealthy, the U.S. Government and the Catholic Church. I know that these groups reason are always centered on their attempts to stop Communism/Socialism, which they see as sprouting up everywhere, nevertheless the results are horrible.

Some call these activities preserving the civil order, I call them preserving the rule of the wealthy. and/ or the powerful. Dominion and Domination are the order of the day with the aforementioned. They are doing the exact same thing now right here in the USA, and they have succeeded. That is what all of this torture, death and destruction are all about.

Though Communism/Socialism is cited as the reason for these atrocities one has to remember that they have been going on since the Spanish first entered the Latin Countries. There was no such thing as Communism or Socialism way back then, only the wealthy, the powerful, and the Church.

Peace, harmony and a serious lessening of poverty will take place when the aforementioned forces are defeated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Slaves & Resources Posted by: katz22br
For better or worse?
Posted by: nfamous on Sep 12, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell is this supposed to mean? "While I think that it is certain that, for better or for worse, a group of Muslim fundamentalists carried out the attack...". For better or worse? I'm pretty sure it was for worse. Secondly, there is no way a group of Islamic extremists could get acccess to plant bombs in two of the most secure buildings in the world. The buildings were collapsed by explosions because they came down at free fall speed. That is reality. If you embrace anything else then something is wrong with your brain because it is not within the realm of possibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WTC 7 Posted by: katz22br
dude up there is not to bright
Posted by: willd4change on Sep 12, 2008 12:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyway The US has been toppling democracy and propping up puppet governments all over the world for decades. Iran in 53, mecedonia in 54 so on and so forth. Most people including myself don't want to believe there is a plan by the US to become the global power, and all of the world would become run by corprate america. I read a book the grand chess board writen in 1997 by an author Zbigniew Brzezinski everything he talked about has been spot on. I got out of the army in 1995 because my last combat tour was in kosovo and I was fed up with US foriegn policy. If my guess is right the next country to get screwed with is going to be venezuela, but I could be wrong we'll see. No doubt the government new about the attacks but I am no conspiracy nut and do believe it was a well conducted plan by osama bin laden. The problem is our government allowed it to happen. They sacrificed the lives of those people so they could use it as an excuse to get to Iraq through afganistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fighters? Really?
Posted by: rickiey on Sep 15, 2008 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
35 years ago on September 11th, 28 years before Al-Qaeda fighters

Yeah, you call them fighters? Guess we know on which side you stand, don't we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]