Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush Is Pouring Gas on Afghanistan's Bonfire

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted August 27, 2008.


Mounting NATO bombing raids and widespread detentions of Afghans are rapidly turning the country into the mirror image of Iraq.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan grind forward with their terrible human toll, even as the press and many Americans play who gets thrown off the island with Barack Obama. Coalition forces carried out an airstrike that killed up to 95 Afghan civilians in western Afghanistan on Friday, 50 of them children, President Hamid Karzai said. And the mounting bombing raids and widespread detentions of Afghans are rapidly turning Afghanistan into the mirror image of Iraq. But these very real events, which will have devastating consequences over the next few months and years, are largely ignored by us. We prefer to waste our time on the trivia and gossip that swallow up air time and do nothing to advance our understanding of either the campaign or the wars fought in our name.

As the conflict in Afghanistan has intensified, so has the indiscriminate use of airstrikes, including Friday's, which took place in the Azizabad area of Shindand district in Herat province. The airstrike was carried out after Afghan and coalition soldiers were ambushed by insurgents while on a patrol targeting a known Taliban commander in Herat, the U.S. military said. Hundreds of Afghans, shouting anti-U.S. slogans, staged angry street protests on Saturday in Azizabad to protest the killings, and Karzai condemned the airstrike. 

The United Nations estimates that 255 of the almost 700 civilian deaths in fighting in Afghanistan this year have been caused by Afghan and international troops. The number of civilians killed in fighting between insurgents and security forces in Afghanistan has soared by two-thirds in the first half of this year.

Ghulam Azrat, the director of the middle school in Azizabad, said he collected 60 bodies after the bombing.

"We put the bodies in the main mosque,'' he told the Associated Press by phone, sometimes pausing to collect himself as he wept. "Most of these dead bodies were children and women. It took all morning to collect them."

Azrat said villagers on Saturday threw stones at Afghan soldiers who arrived and tried to give out food and clothes. He said the soldiers fired into the crowd and wounded eight people, including one child.

"The people were very angry," he said. "They told the soldiers, 'We don't need your food, we don't need your clothes. We want our children. We want our relatives. Can you give [them] to us? You cannot, so go away.' "

We are in trouble in Afghanistan. Sending more soldiers and Marines to fight the Taliban is only dumping gasoline on the bonfire. The Taliban assaults, funded largely by the expanded opium trade, are increasingly sophisticated and well coordinated. And the Taliban is exacting a rising toll on coalition troops. Soldiers and Marines are now dying at a faster rate in Afghanistan than Iraq. In an Aug. 18 attack, only 30 miles from the capital, Kabul, the French army lost 10 and had 21 wounded. The next day, hundreds of militants, aided by six suicide bombers, attacked one of the largest U.S. bases in the country. A week before that, insurgents killed three foreign aid workers and their Afghan driver, prompting international aid missions to talk about withdrawing from a country where they already have very limited access. 

Barack Obama, like John McCain, speaks about Afghanistan in words that look as if they were penned by the Bush White House. Obama may call for withdrawing some U.S. troops from Iraq, but he does not want to send them all home. He wants to send them to Afghanistan, or to what he obliquely terms "the right battlefield." Obama said he would deploy an additional 10,000 troops to Afghanistan once he took office.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, afghanistan, chris hedges

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
'T'aint over till it's over
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 27, 2008 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People who say, "He only has five months left in office. How much more damage can he do?" Are kidding themselves. He can and will do a lot more damage between now and January 20, 2009. Keep your eyes wide open.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 'T'aint over till it's over Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: 'T'aint over till it's over Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: 'T'aint over till it's over Posted by: socialpsych
The Headline Skews the Story.
Posted by: -matti on Aug 27, 2008 1:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This headline and Summary were chosen by the Alternet Editors.

The article is not confined to Bush's actions in Afganistan but also focuses on the Obama campaign's rhetoric for escalation of that conflict.

I can hardly see the point of attepting to bias this article as its point is quite consistent and clear and Alternet "publishes" so few articles daily.

So what gives?

Anyway, another troubling report from Chris Hedges, huh?

Militirism and aggression and Empire have become "mainstream" concepts in the U.S. in the 21st Century, apparently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The New Commander ... Posted by: zootlux
» RE: The Headline Skews the Story. Posted by: beautifulady2003
» Normalized Madness Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Normalized Madness Posted by: bottom-line
Impeachment is mandatory
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 27, 2008 2:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether successful or not, impeachment is necessary to uphold the rule of law and decency that will serve two purposes: (1) branding Bush as the craven killer and lunatic that he is; and (2) warning Obamarama and McCain that further military expansion will bring the same result. Congress and the public are utterly illucid in all of this criminality and injustice and I expect nothing will happen. For those that give a damn, please contact impeachbush.org
[Impeach Bush@VoteToImpeach.org]. Sign up, contribute and keep up the pressure that now includes more than one million supporters, myself included.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The precedent has been set Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: The precedent has been set Posted by: BigElectricCat
» ...GOOD LUCK! Posted by: donl51
The Illegal Invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq are Completely Counterproductive To Western Interests
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 27, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The action fuels massive hatred towards the West. For every innocent civilian killed a thousand time as many will become convinced that their only option is to take up arms to defend themselves and their country.

The way to "acquire" a countries resources - or in the case of Afghanistan an energy pipeline is by massive local investment to local people - paying them and helping them to build infrastructure and developing their own local companies.

Seduction works. Rape just gets your own balls blown off.

Until the neocons gained control, the US had massive success at seduction - and whilst it was still doing a fair amount of rape - this largely went by unnoticed by the vast majority.

Not only is the US Military almost universally hated - it has become so bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan that it has become impotent and powerless throught the rest of the World.

So whilst Chavez scorns Bush at the UN with "It still smells of sulphur today" and Russia marches in to Georgia to protect its own interests - the neocons declare they are going to put missiles in Poland.

All the West had to do was be extremely nice in the areas it wants to exploit - like the Chinese infrastructure investment deals in Africa in return for resources.

The idea that you can bomb a country to hell - like a smash and grab at a bank - doesn't work.

When are we going to put these war criminals on trial?

We are in the process of bankrupting ourselves trying to steal. The harder we squeeze the oily ball - the further it gets away.

We've got to stop this madness or it will kill us all via nuclear war.

The Russians are no longer weak and will not be surrounded and intimidated. They are greedy capitalists just like us - who will do business with us - providing we keep off their turf and give them some respect.

Bombing Iraqi and Afghanistan Children - just shows the entire World how disgusting we are.

Its got to stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama: bright but clueless
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Aug 27, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One would think by now that people in Washington, including the obviously bright but increasingly clueless Obama, would realize that our actions in Afghanistan and Pakistan merely undermine what little support we have there, recruit terrorists and Islamist militia fighters, disgust our allies and reduce our credibility. The way to fight terror is not to become terrorists ourselves, nor is there a small, fixed pool of terrorists who can be eliminated for all time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clueless? Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: Clueless? Posted by: bottom-line
» RE: Clueless? Posted by: Quannah
Barack Obama and John McCain will continue the war
Posted by: Harris20 on Aug 27, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meanwhile, as civilians are dying, the opium trade there is thriving. Nobody messes with big business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funded by the opium trade
Posted by: Orinoco on Aug 27, 2008 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems like every story I read on the war in Afghanistan, or Iraq, or pretty much anywhere, there is a line buried somewhere in it that runs something like this: "The Taliban assaults, funded largely by the expanded opium trade..."

I wonder when we are going to realize we could remove all the oxygen from these fires by simply legalizing drugs, selling them in the regulated commercial marketplace, and putting the profits into the pockets of honest businessmen rather than criminals?

I suppose we don't like to connect these dots because so much of our clandestine services also are funded by drug money, and if we cut off that supply we'd have to pay these gentlemen out of tax dollars.

The War on Drugs just seems to be a natural law when reading articles about foreign policy, that it's hard to remember that this is also a matter of policy rather than some fact of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Funded by the opium trade Posted by: Basenjis
» ONE NEEDS BRAINS! Posted by: donl51
» RE: Funded by the opium trade Posted by: BigElectricCat
Bush: The Insatiable Desire for War and Power
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 27, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You want to talk about a morally devoid person? Bush and His Administration is a spitting image. Their rhetoric is unnecessary, their aggression is un-American. We must Rise Up and Stop This Nonsense, re-instate the Constitution have Government LEAVE PEOPLE ALONE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agression is un-American? Posted by: Cathyc
War on Terror
Posted by: US Citizen on Aug 27, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all part of Bush's goofy "War on Terror". If we were truly intent on reducing terror, we wouldn't be dropping bombs from airplanes on Afghan women and children. By declaring war on Terror, this gives the Bush regime the authority to raise any hell and deny any freedoms they want. If Bush and Cheney were truly interested in reducing terror in the world, they would commit suicide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War on Terror Posted by: Quannah
» RE: War on Terror Posted by: bcontent2b
bilbehr
Posted by: bilbehr2007 on Aug 27, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kipling wrote of the British in Afghanistan long ago:

When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier.

Not a pleasant prospect. How will Obama's "right theater" change this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bilbehr Posted by: Dr. P. Mooney
» RE: bilbehr Posted by: Quannah
» RE: bilbehr Posted by: Cybershaman
Disaster Capitalism demands New Disasters!
Posted by: Gretchen on Aug 27, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine should be required reading of all progressives and anyone else who cares about the world. In the last 30 years, the precepts of Disaster Capitalism have become entrenched in driving the greed economy of the US.
Once it was discovered how many profits could be made by creating disasters, privatizing governments around the world, selling them off for pennies on the dollar, then making disasters more and more profitable for the Halliburtons of the world, the only thing that keeps them in business and feeds their insatiable lust for power, privilege and profits are more disasters to pour money into. So the disaster "security" fund gets bigger and bigger, more and more outsourced, the fat cats get fatter the more the world burns around them and the more miserable and impoverished the masses become.
This is planned, entrenched and many many Democrats also embrace the economic "principles" behind it, launched by Milton Friedman's "Chicago Boys".
Problem is the Shock Doctrine is so built into the economy of the world, the secret structures, the flow of money that I doubt that any President or Congress will be able to stop it. Few people have connected the dots between the disaster capitalists and the political and economic reality.
This has nothing to do with incompetence or something that will end January 20th 2009 and as long as free trade means that corporations can be free to protit as much as they want off the backs of the public, this profits for the few at the expense of the many will continue until we burn ourselves out completely.
Afghanistan has one of the most lucrative drug and weapons trades in the world and the more it is destroyed and dragged towards "domocracy at gunpoint", the more $$ the disaster capitalists rake in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One More Disaster Posted by: Last Chance
» The impoverished masses Posted by: Cathyc
STOP SPAMMING THIS WEBSITE!!! (nt)
Posted by: brunowe on Aug 27, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is really getting entertaining.
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Aug 27, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So HughScott gets banned and the next day an "old airline buddy" of his and "ex-Marine" shows up spamming the same repetitive posts using the same writing style as Hugh Scott...

I can't wait to see what the back-story on your next alias is going to be when SemperFiTom gets banned. I think you should have it be a black lesbian lifelong registered Republilcan Iraq War veteran that Hugh Scott pulled out of a burning car and, after saving her life, convinced her to support Obama after directing her to your nonprofit website during her hospital stay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just an
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 27, 2008 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ego trip

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Obama will do the right thing in Afghanistan
Posted by: sirios on Aug 27, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, Scotty i see you have purchased a new breed of lap dog called, a Semper Fi, Fi Fi to do your bidding. Really intelligent ,biting the hand of Alternet who graciously put up with your agenda of "look at me im a reformed rebublican who still loves the smell of napalm in the morning. As for you Semper fi Tom, im sure you are hoping that Obama will" do the right thing ", and BOMB THE HELL OUT OF AFGANISTAN". AHH compasionate conservatism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chris Hedges should be required reading for everyone in the US
Posted by: dayenta on Aug 27, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too bad he's not in politics. we could use more of his sensibilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Onward Into The Valley Of Death
Posted by: shinseiji on Aug 27, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with the U.S. and its NATO surrender monkeys. Two gangs of fundamentalists slaughtering one another, along with a lot of innocents, alas.

Good riddance - they've got it coming!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right except ONE
Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com on Aug 27, 2008 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author seems to have missed the big one, namely the Turkmanistan oil and gas pipeline under construction in Afghanistan by Unocal. Unocal is a Southern California based giant US Oil Company. With support from US and NATO militaries Unocal plans to connect Central Asian energy resources to the Indian ocean ports for export mostly to Pakistan, India, China and Japan. In addition the US hopes to encircle the Russians and the Chinese by land and by air and the Bagram air base north of Kabul is well suited for that purpose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Right except ONE Posted by: opmoc
IMPEACHMENT TIME!!!!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 27, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe that this country really has a clue as to how deep nor how much we don't know that has been going on with this group of thugs! I'm sure that Don Corleone would be proud!

Seriously, war is hell, and the longer our young men and women are over there brutalizing and being brutalized the more they will incite the next generation in their hatred toward the west! These wars were prosecuted without forethought, planning, and intelligence! Did no one take notes on what the Soviet Union went thru in their mis-adventure in Afghanistan! When people that don't have much, and you take and continue to take what little they do have, they retaliate, and in that part of the world retaliation is generational! Bribery only works for so long, and unlike Americans their collective memories will continue on ad infinitum as long as we stay in their country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IMPEACHMENT TIME!!!! Posted by: Basenjis
876
Posted by: 876 on Aug 27, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have set up their torture camps and are arresting people in their own country yet still they talk of “terror” and “terrorists” and pretend they are the righteous and the democratic.

It was Americans who unleashed the dregs of Arab societies on Afghanistan, used the people and the nation of Afghanistan to defeat their enemies now they have the complete audacity to feel they are entitled to wage yet more brutality on Afghanistan to feel they have been done wrong by Afghanistan, when in fact they should grovel at the feet of Afghanistan and beg forgiveness for their brutal inhumanity.

Today McCain promises to shower Afghanistan with bombs and genocide because he has seen the positive response Barrack Obama has received for as much from the American public. Why do you think George Bush has admitted that Bin Laden is irrelevant? It is because he knows there is NO Bin Laden. You’re war as in Iraq is for American self interests, pipelines and theft and nothing else. Only the hysterical American masses could feel threatened by the world’s poorest nation.

You celebrate the foaming at the mouth psychopath Obama as if he were your salvation but four years from now you will no doubt disown this animal you elected as you do with Bush, the man you once dreamed of having a “have a beer with”.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 876 Posted by: beautifulady2003
Losing again
Posted by: solrev on Aug 27, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If what Kudlow says is true that “free market capitalism is the best way to prosperity”, why are we paying the puppet government and our own troops to destroy the Afghanistan poppy farmers? The Taliban supports Afghanistan farmers and we destroy them. Who do you think is going to win that war? The easiest way to win the hearts and minds of the people is to stop killing them. If we would have just let the Afghanistan people do their thing after we routed the Taliban and al-qaeda, and maybe chipped in some schools and hospitals, the game would be over buy now. The Afghanistan people our not stupid, if poppies are not a good business they will find something else. No we have to divide their land into good guys and bad guys and trap ourselves again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unabomber On A Bigger Scale
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Aug 27, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our president is the Unabomber on a grander scale; the horrors visited upon the Afghan populace will not make us forget what America's foreign policy has done to bring havoc to those unfortunate people.
We can't find a way to end the destruction there, too. Obama will make a big mistake if he wants to keep fighting in a distant part of the globe. The next fuehrer should find a way to wean America from the culture of war, whether clandestine or not. We need to become like New Zealand.
Fighting people over there will not make us safer. How many more bombs can we drop on Afghanistan? It's beginning to look a lot like Laos.
But remember we have less than 160 days until the Reign of Error leaves the White House.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Afghanistan
Posted by: kittyhegemann on Aug 27, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is quite obvious that most people know nothing about the history of Afghanistan. When they had a king and didn't like him, the people killed him. They have been tribal nomads most of their history and were Buddhist until the Muslims forced that religion upon them. There is a long, long history of independence and rebellion against anybody who wants to dominate them. We need to get over our imperialism. Give them the freedom and tools to make their own choices. The people would kick out the Taliban and Al Queda. Both are Pakistani creations not Afghani.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What should have been done . . .
Posted by: mayor on Aug 27, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not Monday-morning quarterbacking . . . the following is what I said prior to the bombing/invasion of Afghanistan.

Rather than attack and invade the entire country of Afghanistan, we should have seized some of the ex-soviet military bases and used them as launching pads to attack and destroy Al-Qaeda, with notice given to the Taliban that we would leave them alone if they chose not to attack us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» al CIAda works for the government Posted by: bottom-line
I Give The Opinion Some Consideration That The US Has Been Sucked Into These Wars To Destroy The US
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 27, 2008 4:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whilst obviously the people attacked are suffering terribly - the American people are also suffering terribly - and will have to pay all the costs for generations to come.

I tried to read Chalmers Johnson's Book "Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic" but I found it so terminally depressing that it made me cry.

Lyndon Larouche claims its the British - though I think he's a nut - and I haven't found any evidence to support his claims.

But surely America is not doing this to itself?
It's insanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Bush is the Antichrist
Posted by: bottom-line on Aug 27, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever can anybody be thinking to allow the government to initiate WWIII, to build all the concentration camps for American citizens, and to bring death to billions, to turn the planet into a nuclear wasteland?

The very idea -- attacking Russia. They have 20,000 nukes. I can see it now. We are going to be attacked by Russia, China and a lot of other countries. The next time we go blasting away some innocent country will be our last.

Insanity reigns supreme. Who cares about this election? We are living on borrowed time. The nukes are going to be dropping everywhere, and this country is doomed.

Thank you, neoCONs, Luciferians, lovers of death and torture and horrors. Why didn't the American people wake up and stop them? The world is waiting and watching, hoping and praying that the American people will not let these horrors progress. But we act like we are oblivious to everything, and we will be the first to find out hte hard way that we were tricked, deceived, distracted from our duty to wake up and speak up. Everybody knows but us.

All we can do now is try to get right with God and wait for destruction that's coming. For what!

Listen to Alex Jones online, www.infowars.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush, McCain, Obama--All will do Damage
Posted by: dayahka on Aug 27, 2008 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see much difference between the incumbent and the two main pretenders--they all are acceptable to the militarists and warmongers who own and dominate this country. Bush may be a bit daffy, but he appears as the lesser evil of the all-war-all-the-time McCain, and Obama seems to be not so much against senseless wars as against one kind of senseless war, but not against war. I see no point in getting excited about this absurd so-called election: it's all going to be more of the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hate The State
Posted by: JSurveyor on Aug 27, 2008 5:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Written in 1881, this is eerily applicable today, perhaps more so than ever before:
"The State, that is the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly, also, it lies; and the lie that creeps from it's mouth is this: "I, the State, am the People." That is a lie! Those who created peoples were creators, and they hung a faith over them and a love, and so, served life. Destroyers are those who lay snares for many and call it the State: they hang a sword over them and a hundred cravings. Where people still exist, the State is not understood, but hated as the evil eye and as sin against custom and law. I give unto you this sign: every people speaks of good and evil in it's own language, which it's neighbor does not understand. It has devised it's language for itself in customs and in laws. But the State lies about good and evil in all tongues; and whatever it says, it lies-and whatever it has, it has stolen. Everything in it is false; it bites with stolen teeth-the biter. False even are it's bowels... But the earth still is free for good souls. Open still are many sites for one alone or two alone, where the odor floats of quiet seas... There where the State leaves off-look but there, my Brother! Do you not see it: the rainbow and the bridge of the Superman?"
Friedrich Nietzsche from Thus Spake Zarathustra

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Don't Think the Reign of Error is going to Leave
Posted by: bottom-line on Aug 27, 2008 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think WWIII will be in full swing, having already started in 8/8/8. It will be marshal law, FEMA camps, and lots of dead and disappeared people. Bush has already notified us that he is dictator, that the Constitution is just a G..D... piece of paper.

The people fighting the "War on Terror" ARE the terrorists.

9/11 was an inside job. Everybody knows. They did it, and then they stepped up to play the role of saviors so they could trash the constitution and start WWIII. Hitler got away with burning the Reichstag, and these people got away with blowing up the twin towers and Building 7, also the Pentagon and the phony Pennsylvania crash landing (that never happened).

Watch 9/11 Mysteries by Sofia, a great documentary, on line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

excellent assessment by Chris Hedges, as ususal
Posted by: Robert K. MacDonald on Aug 27, 2008 11:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Robert MacDonald (H.Marcuse PhD)
Because Obama has "de facto" adopted the predatory genocidal imperialist Middle East energy-war policies of the Republicans and their imperialist Democratic Party allies; and because he wants to top them in adventurist aggressiveness by plunging our forces into wars with Afghans, Pakistanis, Georgians,and Russians,
We who are experts on the many domestic and global dangers of permanent global war-profiteering facilited by corrupted relations between state, media and university imbeddedness-careerists in the war-contractor decision makers who run our nation, we who have divorced our lives wisely and righteously from that national racketeering system should support Nader and candidates that who truly are working for major "system changes" rather than vague cosmetic changes, vague promisses, and childish popularity pagents like the major party conventions.
Only Democrats like Dennis Kucinich are worthy of our precious support.
Robert MacDonald (going-to-jail type activist since early 1950's and Head of the most wildly successful American Soviet Friendship Society in the 1980's in Hawaii.)
Robert MacDonald

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]