Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Media Goof Again: Blackwater Isn't Going Anywhere

By Jeremy Scahill, Comment Is Free. Posted July 23, 2008.


Despite reports that the company is leaving the mercenary business, Blackwater's future is secure.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It seems that executives from Blackwater Worldwide, the Bush administration's favorite hired guns in Iraq and Afghanistan, are threatening to pack up their M4 assault rifles, CS gas and Little Bird helicopters and go back to the great dismal swamp of North Carolina whence they came. Or at least that's how it is being portrayed in the media.

This story broke on Monday, when the Associated Press ran an article based on lengthy interviews with Blackwater's top guns. Since then, the story has picked up considerable steam and generated a tremendous amount of buzz online and in the press. After all, Blackwater has long been a key part of the U.S. occupation and has been at the center of several high-profile scandals and deadly incidents. Add to that its owner's ties to the White House and the radical religious right and it is clear why this is news. On top of that, Barack Obama -- a critic of Blackwater -- just completed a tour of Iraq, where he was touting his withdrawal plan.

Among the headlines of the past 24 hours: "Blackwater plans exit from guard work", "Blackwater getting out of security business", "Blackwater sounds retreat from private security business", and "Blackwater to leave security business". One blogger slapped this headline on his post: "Blackwater, worst organization since SS, to end mercenary work."

Frankly, this is a whole lot of hype.

Anyone who thinks Blackwater is in serious trouble is dead wrong. Even if -- and this is a big if -- the company pulled out of Iraq tomorrow, here is the cold, hard fact: business has never been better for Blackwater, and its future looks bright. More on this in a moment.

Back to the matter at hand. Complaining that negative media attention and congressional and criminal investigations are hurting business and that the Blackwater name had become a catch-all target for anti-war protesters, the company's brass told the AP that Blackwater was shifting its focus to its other areas of government contracting, like law enforcement and military training, as well as logistics.

''The experience we've had would certainly be a disincentive to any other companies that want to step in and put their entire business at risk,'' said Erik Prince, Blackwater's reclusive, 39 year-old founder and owner. Company president Gary Jackson said Blackwater has become like the "Coca-Cola" of war contractors, a brand representing all private companies servicing the Iraq occupation. Jackson charged the company had been falsely portrayed in the media, saying, ''If [the media] could get it right, we might stay in the business.''

All of this sounds a bit like whining on a children's playground.

Shame on journalists for not recognizing the noble work of the gallant heroes and patriots (who happen to be paid much more than US troops and have not been subjected to any system of law and who can leave the war zone any moment they choose) and forcing Blackwater to consider abandoning its (very profitable, billion-dollar) charitable humanitarian campaign in Iraq. Remember, according to Blackwater, it is not a mercenary organization. It is a "peace and stability" operation employing "global stabilization professionals."

While they were at it, Jackson and Prince should have blamed those wretched 17 Iraqi civilians who had the audacity to step in front of the bullets flying out of Blackwater's weapons in Baghdad's Nisour Square last September. After all, following those killings, Erik Prince p>


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, bush administration, barack obama, blackwater, mercenaries, erik prince, nisour square, greystone, private security companie, gary jackson

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
not disagreeing with the central premise, but...
Posted by: liz_s on Jul 23, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not exactly concerned about Blackwater's bottom line, nor am I shocked at Scahill's examples of its diversified business endeavors. But writing a story about Blackwater *possibly* leaving the security business in the current wars should probably mention the chaos this would cause. As the WaPo article noted, the last time Blackwater wasn't working (they temporarily had their business license revoked, or something), American officials couldn't leave the Green Zone. I'm sure it wasn't just American officials, either - these guys are doing a very good job keeping Iraqi and foreign politicians/leaders alive. Of course, in the process, they're being counterproductive to the COIN effort by making the safety of their charges their only priority, and killing/wounding Iraqis. So, obviously, in the long run, returning their tasks to the military or putting them under the jurisdiction of DOD is a necessity. But right now - our government can make noises about wanting to regulate/kick them out, but if they actually leave, it's not going to look so good. They hold the power in this particular exchange.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Possible Explanation? (as regards Iraq)
Posted by: slaird46 on Jul 23, 2008 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I would be very surprised if Blackwater folded up its tent and crept off into the sunset internationally, there is a situation in the Iraqi parliament that might explain why they're making these kinds of noises.

The U.N. mandate that makes the U.S. invasion and continued occupation of Iraq "legitimate" in terms of international law, if in no other, expires at the end of the year.

For months, the Iraqi parliament and U.S. negotiators have been working to try to hammer out an agreement or contract between the two governments for what happens at the end of that time -- a document that "legitimizes" continued U.S. presence there. (For anyone who's been following the story of that negotiation, Maliki's public statement about timed withdrawal of U.S. forces was very old news, indeed.)

After much posturing by both the Suni and Shiite members, including walkouts and threats of disbanding parliament and throwing the whole country back into the chaos that preceded the Iraqi election, it appears that there are two items which both major Iraqi factions agree are non-negotiable: 1) the timed (subject to conditions "on the ground") withdrawal of U.S. troops, and 2) under absolutely no circumstances will there be amnesty for actions (atrocities) committed by private contractors in Iraq.

The parliament and the U.S. are still miles apart on reaching a final agreement, and in fact may not, presenting an even more interesting set of circumstances for the U.S. administration, but it now appears clear that the two items above are set in stone from the Iraqi point of view.

If I were Blackwater and I knew that, I'd be making noises about getting out of the security business, too. I'd be setting the stage for telling the DOD that business considerations make it impossible for us to continue in that line of business; sorry, but the contract's canceled; here's a little of your money back; thanks for the good time -- and airlifting my guys out of there in the dark of night before they're all rounded up in some kind of war crimes proceeding.

No one is more hated by the Iraqi people than the Blackwater mercenaries, and now that the end of the occupation appears near, they want their pound of flesh! And while I'd rather give them Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, et. al., (and I'd throw in Wm Kristol and some of the other neocon cheerleaders for free), it's hard to find fault with their sentiments.

Much has been said about where U.S. troops would be without Blackwater, and it's possible that the out-of-business noise is a threat to Bushco to harden U.S. dedication to an agreement that includes Blackwater amnesty.

Or not. Everything I've suggested here may be nothing more than me farting in the bathtub, but it seemed worth throwing the suggestion out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Agree Posted by: slaird46
» RE: I Agree Posted by: liz_s
I hear . . .
Posted by: dba on Jul 23, 2008 10:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that these miserable mercenary pricks are quietly moving some training operations to Northern Idaho. We will not make it easy for them. I guess you could consider this inflammatory, if they retaliate against us for making them UNWELCOME! Blackwater or some derivative will very likely be the end of our once great nation. Some government operations must be left in the hands of a government we can trust - does such a thing still exist?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Okay, let's review...
Posted by: ranchero42 on Jul 24, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once they were laid low, but, lo, they have arisen from their tomb? Are you sure you want to publicize this shit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Okay, let's review... Posted by: ranchero42
JUST BECAUSE A MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES THINK IT IS WRONG
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 24, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't mean it is going to stop. Seventy percent of the public surveyed back in the 90s wanted federal government help for health insurance. Notice that the 30% won. It is a measure of the failure of democracy.

There will be no candidates on the ballot in my state other than democrat or republican. They protect their monopoly. Do we ever need Harry Truman back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater to seek profts from chaos elsewhere
Posted by: laviniasrevenge on Jul 24, 2008 6:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed, Matt Apuzzo and Mike Baker wrote a total puff piece on Blackwater on Monday, allowing Erik Prince to seize the occasion to reframe Blackwater's mission in now-familiar terms, as a responsible, patriotic company ready and willing to serve, but unfairly targeted by anti-war activists and a hostile media. "If you could get it right, we might stay in the business," Prince retorts in the interview, his resentment undermining his own carefully crafted ethos. For a company whose profits depend upon the perpetual flow of no-bid government contracts and immunity from the rule of law, the cooperation of a right-minded media is an essential feature of the business plan. Maybe Matt and Mike are on the Blackwater payroll? Yet, the Washington Post, New York Times, and LA Times and Wall Street Journal have continued to report on the defense department's attempts at oversight of a now massive industry of war profiteering, stories these astute reporters must have missed in the past year. Wisely, Erik Prince neglected to mention the most lucrative contract that now looms on the horizon for Blackwater: a opportunity to profit handily from the insecurity and chaos on the US-Mexico border. According to a report last year by Solomon Moore of the NYTimes, Marty Strong, Blackwater's vice president for communications, revealed that Blackwater's participation in this new $15 billion mission to fight narcoterrorism led them to seek out properties in San Diego County to build new facilities. Strong further explained in the report that the proximity of military installations, borders, ports, and several of the nation's local law enforcement agencies made San Diego an ideal market for Blackwater. A report by Government Executive.com outlining more details of the project suggests that in spite of Blackwater's insistence to the contrary, their intentions in opening a new facility in Otay Mesa include reaping massive profits from the increased militarization of the US-Mexico border.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of Course
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Jul 24, 2008 8:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater will be around. Who would operate the concentration camps?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Of Course Posted by: ranchero42
Of Course
Posted by: TruthBeTold on Jul 24, 2008 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater will be around. Who would operate the concentration camps?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of the confusion is
Posted by: Babygoat on Jul 25, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part of the confusion is that... NO- IT ISN'T BLACKWATER....It's OIL on the water...and the
Imperial States of aka America is in some very deep DO-DO and must be flushed!

And, who would guard the prison camps of the former patriotic, afore mentioned, americans? I suppose either BalckWater or the NEW World Imperial Forces! Heil!...Welcome to the New World Order! Ceaser Bush- Kaiser George- Liars,Inc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]